July 25, 2026 07:55 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'No assurances, sack Dharmendra Pradhan': CJP fires back at PM Modi over NEET row | 'Don't insult students': Rahul Gandhi tears into PM Modi's midnight NEET video, demands Dharmendra Pradhan's exit | Trump slaps fresh tariffs on India, China and 58 others over forced labour concerns | Sonam Wangchuk ends 26-day hunger strike after 'long negotiations', urges CJP protesters to maintain peace | PM Modi promises fresh steps on paper leaks in late night video | NEET protest: Centre invites CJP for talks; protesters stick to Jantar Mantar or neutral venue demand | Khalistani terrorist Pannun announces $1 million support for CJP protests, calls for 'balkanisation of India' | 'We'll put drugs in your bag': Mumbai cop suspended after viral threat to NEET protesters | 'Fulfill the demands first': CJP hits back at PM Modi's message for youth | Delhi cop seen slapping woman protester removed from Jantar Mantar after viral outrage

Anti-CAA protest: Supreme Court refuses to hear pleas, refers case to HC

| @indiablooms | Dec 17, 2019, at 04:11 pm

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to entertain pleas on police atrocities against students of Jamia Millia Islamia and Aligarh Muslim University during protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act on Sunday.

The top court redirected the petitions to high courts and said the high courts can set up inquiry panels.

A bench headed by Chief Justice of India S A Bobde after hearing senior advocates Indira Jaising, Sanjay Hegde and Colin Gonsalves said, "Having regard to the nature of the matter and dispute, and the vast area over which the matter is spread, we do not think it is feasible to appoint one committee for this. The High Courts can be approached where the incidents have taken place."

Asking the petitioners to move the High Courts in this regard, the bench said, the High courts have the liberty to appoint retired judges for the purposes of inquiry after hearing the Union and the State Government."

"We are not a trial court. We will not be establishing facts. You should be knowing this", the CJI told the petitioners.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.