October 03, 2026 03:55 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Asian Games 2026: India beat Pakistan to clinch gold in men's cricket | flydubai cockpit attack: Deleted posts expose Omani co-pilot’s views on women, alleged extremist past | flydubai cockpit horror: Omani co-pilot Hamam al-Hammami attacked Captain Smit Machchhar with crash axe, tried to seize control | flydubai temporarily suspends all Israel flights after co-pilot’s alleged cockpit attack, crash attempt | Grounded in Oman over ‘radical views’, then hired by flydubai: What we know about Omani pilot Hamam al-Hammami | ‘Hanuman Chalisa gave me courage’: Smit Machchhar recounts flydubai cockpit battle to PM Modi | PM Modi speaks to Flydubai pilot Smit Machchhar who foiled crash plot, praises his courage | Putin praises Modi’s ‘good ideas’ to end Ukraine war, thanks Indian PM for peace efforts | Flydubai cockpit attack: Injured Indian pilot Smit Machchhar airlifted to Abu Dhabi | India backs brave flydubai pilot Smit Machchhar, Ambassador meets family after cockpit attack

Book on 'Sahara' released by former SEBI chairman

| | Jun 10, 2014, at 09:15 pm
Mumbai, Jun 10 (IBNS): Former SEBI chairman M. Damodaran on Tuesday released a controversial book Sahara – The Untold Story, penned by veteran banking sector reporter and Deputy Managing editor of 'Mint' Tamal Bandyopadhyay, here.

The book reveals several facts, incidents and opinions which were never in public and also satisfies many curiosities about Sahara Group especially in the light of the ongoing Sahara and SEBI case.

In his book Tamal Bandyopadhyay noted that the RBI had reconstituted the Sahara India Financial Corporation Ltd’s board in July 2008 and appointed three independent directors – H N Sinor, former MD of ICICI Bank, Chartered Accountant TN Manoharan and 1970 batch IAS officer Arvind Jadhav.

Bandyopadhyay said, "If we just look back in 2008, it would be evident that Sahara once repaid 18,000 crore rupees to four crore investors under direct supervision of the Reserve Bank of India and no debate was there about the authenticity of investors."

"The board did not come across a single complaint of a customer losing money and there was not even a single case of violation detected even after the board tightened the KYC norms," Bandyopadhyay added.

"Photographs were taken of all depositors, branches were audited and random checks, technically called in-person verification were conducted, but not a single case of violation was detected,” the author quoted HN Sinor.

In the book, Bandyopadhyay mentioned, the independent directors of SIFCL board received the full cooperation of the Sahara Group.

Even Subrata Roy himself made it a point to attend most of their board meetings, the author noted.

Interestingly, some of the money that was being repaid to investors was finding its way back into Sahara Group companies and that signifies the faith of depositors on the group.

The book quotes one of the leaders of Indian banking sector, Sinor as saying that Sahara was a “unique lab of financial inclusion: It inculcated the habit of savings in poor people.”

The book said that by the time Manoharan and Sinor resigned in October 2011, SIFCL’s deposit liability came down to about Rs. 2,000 crore and net owned funds rose to Rs. 3,000 crore.

This may again be a proof that the investors who had put money with the company were not fictitious, Bandyopadhyay said.

Bandyopadhyay further mentioned in his book that had the regulators not entangled him; Roy would have done wonders in India.

He added that Sahara had just the right and well-entrenched model for financial inclusion, which has now become the mantra of both government and RBI.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.