December 06, 2025 03:18 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
In front of Putin, PM Modi makes bold statement on Russia-Ukraine war: ‘India is not neutral, we side with peace!’ | Rupee weakens following RBI repo rate cut | RBI slashes repo rate by 25 basis points — big relief coming for borrowers! | 'Mamata fooled Muslims': Humayun Kabir explodes after TMC suspends him over 'Babri Masjid-style mosque' demand; announces new party | Mosque in the middle of Kolkata airport? Centre confirms flight risks, BJP fires at Mamata | Sam Altman is betting big on India! OpenAI in advanced talks with Tata to build AI infrastructure | Government removes mandatory pre-installation of Sanchar Saathi App. Know all details | Calcutta HC overturns controversial Bengal job annulment — 32,000 teachers rejoice! | Bengal SIR shock: 1 lakh ‘deceased voters’ found in Kolkata North! | Massive twist in Bengal voter list: ‘Perfect’ 2,280 booths shrink to just 480 after probe!

Is it time to drop the ‘complete the course’ message for antibiotics?

| | Jul 31, 2017, at 03:52 am
London, July 30 (IBNS): Oxford researchers are among a group of infectious disease experts to argue that the advice that patients should complete a course of antibiotics is not supported by evidence and should be dropped.

In a paper published in The BMJ , the authors, who include National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) professors Tim Peto and Sarah Walker, say that patients are being put at unnecessary risk from antibiotic resistance when treatment is given for longer than necessary, not when it is stopped early.

They say it is time for policymakers, educators and doctors to drop the ‘complete the course’ message and state that it is not based on evidence.

Prof Peto said: 'The notion that stopping antibiotic treatment early encourages antibiotic resistance is not supported by evidence. At the same time, taking antibiotics for longer than is necessary increases the risk of resistance.'

The analysis, which was led by Prof Martin Llewelyn of Brighton and Sussex Medical School, was done for the ARK-hospital PGfAR programme, and for the NIHR’s Health Protection Research Unit at Oxford University.

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust is one of the leading collaborators in ARK-hospital, an NIHR-funded research programme aiming to safely reduce antibiotic use in hospitals.

Prof Walker, co-theme lead for Antimicrobial Resistance and Modernising Microbiology at the Oxford BRC, added: 'One reason why the ‘complete the course’ advice is so resilient is that it is clear, simple and unambiguous, and the behaviour it calls for is easily followed. But evidence suggests that, often, stopping antibiotics sooner is a safe and effective way to reduce antibiotic overuse.

'Completing the course also goes against one of the most fundamental and widespread medication beliefs people have – that we should take as little medication as necessary.

'Antibiotics are a precious and finite natural resource which should be conserved by tailoring treatment duration for individual patients,' she added.

The team are calling for more research to develop simple, alternative messages, such as ‘stop when you feel better’. They say that clinical trials are needed to determine the most effective strategies for optimising the duration of antibiotic treatment.

The full paper, 'The antibiotic course has had its day,' can be read in the The BMJ.

 

Photo: WHO/Jim Holmes

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.