October 07, 2026 03:48 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
RBI shocks borrowers with first repo rate hike since 2023; rates raised to 5.50% | ‘Completely false’: Virat Kohli reacts to ₹5 crore claim over Premanand Maharaj visit | We’re watching it very closely: US urges Russia to share more information on plague situation | This isn’t about schools: Trump blames ‘mass migration’ and Islam for violent protests across France | ‘Crash axe’ blow fractured Smit Machchhar’s skull: Shocking details emerge from flydubai cockpit horror | ‘Vote thief’ Gyanesh Kumar: Rahul Gandhi climbs barricade, waves Tricolour during explosive INDIA bloc protest | ‘Crash axe’ blow fractured Smit Machchhar’s skull: Shocking details emerge from flydubai cockpit horror | ‘He should not have been flying’: JD Vance on Flydubai co-pilot | Israel was ready to shoot down Flydubai jet if it kept flying towards Tel Aviv: Reports | 'If law wasn't followed, we can undo it': Supreme Court's big warning on SIR process amid Gyanesh Kumar row
Astrazeneca

AstraZeneca COVID jab 'less effective against South Africa variant': Reports

| @indiablooms | Feb 08, 2021, at 12:04 am

Johannesburg/UNI: According to reports the COVID-19 vaccine developed by AstraZeneca and the University of Oxford offers only limited protection against the South African variant of the coronavirus, a spokesman for the British drugmaker said here on Sunday.

The statement came after the Financial Times reported that the vaccine failed to provide protection against the mild and moderate disease caused by the South African variant of the virus, Aljazeera reported.

The newspaper cited data from a trial conducted by South Africa’s University of the Witwatersrand and the University of Oxford, the findings of which are due to be published on Monday.

The FT noted that none of the more than 2,000 mainly healthy and young participants in the trial had been hospitalised or died. However, the findings are yet to be peer-reviewed.

However, the company said that it believed its vaccine could protect against severe disease, given that the neutralising antibody activity was equivalent to that of other COVID-19 vaccines that have demonstrated protection against severe disease.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.