January 01, 2026 05:36 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
No third party involved: India govt sources refute China’s Operation Sindoor ceasefire claim | Amit Shah blasts TMC over border fencing; Mamata fires back on Pahalgam and Delhi blast | 'A profound loss for Bangladesh politics': Sheikh Hasina mourns Khaleda Zia’s death | PM Modi mourns Khaleda Zia’s death, hails her role in India-Bangladesh ties | Bangladesh’s first female Prime Minister Khaleda Zia passes away at 80 | India rejects Pakistan’s Christmas vandalism remarks, cites its ‘abysmal’ minority record | Minority under fire: Hindu houses torched in Bangladesh village | Supreme Court puts Aravalli redefinition on hold amid uproar, awaits new expert committee | Supreme Court strikes! Kuldeep Sengar’s bail in Unnao case suspended amid public outcry | From bitter split to big reunion! Pawars join hands again for high-stakes civic battle
Image: University of Queensland website

World’s protected areas being rapidly destroyed by humanity: Study

| @indiablooms | May 18, 2018, at 11:22 pm

Sydney, May 18 (IBNS): One-third of the world’s protected land is under intense human pressure, according to an international study described as ‘a stunning reality check’ on efforts to avert a biodiversity crisis.

The University of Queensland-led research has found six million square kilometres of protected land – equivalent to two-thirds the size of China – is in a state unlikely to conserve endangered biodiversity.

PhD candidate Kendall Jones said in some cases the scale of damage was striking, with the greatest impacts found in heavily populated places including Asia, Europe and Africa.

“We found major road infrastructure such as highways, industrial agriculture, and even entire cities occurring inside the boundaries of places supposed to be set aside for nature conservation,”  Jones said.

“More than 90 per cent of protected areas, such as national parks and nature reserves, showed some signs of damaging human activities.”

UQ Professor James Watson, a Wildlife Conservation Society research director, said the study clearly showed nations were overestimating the space available for nature inside protected areas.

“Governments are claiming these places are protected for the sake of nature when in reality they aren’t,” Professor Watson said.

“It is a major reason why biodiversity is still in catastrophic decline, despite more and more land being protected over the past few decades.”

The study used the most comprehensive global map of human pressure on the environment, the Human Footprint, to analyse human activity across almost 50,000 protected areas.

Large, strictly protected areas were under far less human pressure than smaller protected areas where wider ranges of human activities were permitted.

Professor Watson said well-funded, well-managed and well-placed, land protection areas were extremely effective in halting threats to biodiversity loss and ensuring species return from the brink of extinction.

“There are also many protected areas that are still in good condition and protect the last strongholds of endangered species worldwide,” Professor Watson said.

“The challenge is to ensure those protected areas that are most valuable for nature conservation get the most attention from governments and donors to ensure they safeguard it.”

Jones said all nations need to be honest when accounting for how much land they have set aside for biodiversity conservation.

“It is time for the global conservation community to stand up and hold governments to account so that they take the conservation of their protected areas seriously,” he said.

The study, involving UQ, the Wildlife Conservation Society and the University of Northern British Columbia, appears in the prestigious journal Science.

 

 

 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.