October 25, 2026 03:47 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Jamia shifts classes online after clash over demand for student union polls; Congress MPs face allegations | Deadly mid-air collision: Four pilots killed as two military aircraft crash in Philippines | ‘Jihad’ calls, Modi assassination remarks: Mumbai Rapido driver arrested over alleged Jaish links | Vegetarian-only kitchen at Keralam Lok Bhavan? Governor's reported order triggers political backlash | ‘Another little Epic Fury’: Trump’s chilling warning to Iran as fresh US strikes loom | Bomb threat email names Amitabh Bachchan’s Jalsa bungalow, Diljit Dosanjh’s concert venue: Reports | ‘Face-offs still continue’: ITBP chief reveals fresh India-China border tensions in Arunachal | Eiffel Tower women staff row: BAPS monk blames ‘miscommunication’, denies delegation's role | ‘Pen, not stones and guns’: RSS-linked group opens its first office in Kashmir Valley under Muslim leader | First human case of Shamonda virus reported in France; WHO confirms death of immunocompromised patient

UN rights expert calls for halt to Indonesia executions, cites international obligations

| | Feb 14, 2015, at 07:11 pm
New York, Feb 14 (IBNS) A United Nations human rights official has on Friday urged Indonesia not to follow through with the executions of eight people who were convicted of drug-related offences.

UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial executions, Christof Heyns, urged a halt to further executions of people convicted of such offences, after six prisoners were executed in January and Indonesian officials announced that eight more would be executed by firing squad in the coming days.

“Under international law, the death penalty is regarded as an extreme form of punishment which, if it is used at all, should only be imposed for the most serious crimes, that is, those involving intentional killing, and only after a fair trial, among other safeguards,” Heyns said.

“However, despite, several appeals by UN human rights experts and civil society organizations urging the Indonesian Government to reconsider imposing the death penalty for drug related offences, the authorities decided to execute six people by firing squad on 18 January 2015.”

The UN human rights office says that the available information suggests that the 14 people were convicted after unfair trials. Twelve of the people are foreign nationals who did not receive adequate interpreting services or the right to translators or lawyers at all stages of their trials and appeals.

“Any death sentence must comply with international obligations related to the stringent respect of fair trial and due process guarantees, as stipulated in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which Indonesia is a State party,” Heyns said. “I previously expressed concerns over the imposition of death penalty for drug related offenses, and that such death sentences undertaken in contravention of Indonesia’s international human rights obligations is tantamount to an arbitrary execution.”

He said the International Covenant provided that anyone sentenced to death shall have the right to seek pardon or commutation of the sentence.

“I regret that the authorities continue to execute people in violation of international human rights standards,” said Heyns. “I urge the Government of Indonesia to establish a moratorium on execution with a view of its complete abolition, in order to comply with the international move towards the abolition of the death penalty.”

Independent experts or special rapporteurs are appointed by the Geneva-based Human Rights Council to examine and report back on a country situation or a specific human rights theme. The positions are honorary and the experts are not UN staff, nor are they paid for their work.

Photo: Jean-Marc Ferré

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.