December 11, 2025 03:42 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Caught in Thailand! Fugitive Goa nightclub owners detained after deadly fire kills 25 | After Putin’s blockbuster Delhi visit, Modi set to host German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in January | Delhi High Court slams govt, orders swift compensation as IndiGo crisis triggers fare shock and nationwide chaos | Amazon drops a massive $35 billion India bet! AI push, 1 million jobs and big plans revealed at Smbhav Summit | IndiGo’s ‘All OK’ claim falls apart! Govt slaps 10% flight cut after weeklong chaos | Centre finally aligns IndiGo flights with airline's operating ability, cuts its winter schedule by 5% | Odisha's Malkangiri in flames: Tribals rampage Bangladeshi settlers village after beheading horror! | Race against time! Indian Navy sends four more warships to Cyclone Ditwah-hit Sri Lanka | $2 billion mega deal! HD Hyundai to build shipyard in Tamil Nadu — a game changer for India | After 8 years of legal drama, Malayalam actor Dileep acquitted in 2017 rape case — what really happened?
Terrorism

Misuse of terrorism laws during conflict creates ‘unmitigated calamity’

| @indiablooms | Oct 17, 2020, at 03:35 pm

New York: The misuse of terrorism laws during conflict situations often leads to an “unmitigated calamity” on the ground, an independent UN expert has warned.

Fionnuala Ní Aoláin, UN Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights while countering terrorism, told the General Assembly on Thursday that what are being billed by some governments as counter-terrorism measures, are being applied frequently to address domestic strife and in complex humanitarian settings.

In these cases, they can have a catastrophic impact on civilian populations, she said, which are being “squeezed by broadly framed terrorism laws and practices with little or no recourse, when misuse occurs”.

Protecting rights, enforcing norms

The independent expert identified a “profoundly” worrying pattern whereby some States are ignoring or undermining humanitarian rules because counter-terrorism “offers a more open-ended, under-regulated and opaque set of tools”, to manage complex problems.

Her report tracks the essential relationship between protecting the human rights of the most vulnerable – including the elderly and children – in complex and fragile settings and enforcing basic humanitarian norms, including providing humanitarian assistance.

“I am profoundly troubled by the failure to apply humanitarian exemptions for activities that are humanitarian and impartial in nature”, said Ms. Ní Aoláin.

“Such short-sighted tactics of withholding or criminalizing humanitarian assistance only prolongs conflicts, alienates those who are needed to ultimately resolve such conflicts, and hurts the most marginal in society”.

Affirm compliance

In her report, the Special Rapporteur acknowledged the Security Council’s “persistent and unequivocal affirmation” that counter-terrorism measures must “always and fully” comply with the overarching norms of international human rights law, international humanitarian law and refugee law.

She called on States to review existing sanctions systems to make sure that they are rule of law-compliant and provide “meaningful opportunity to challenge, review and end sanctions practices for affected individuals and their families”.

The UN envoy also applauded the work of impartial humanitarian actors, who carry out their duties in extreme conditions and under significant stress to protect the vulnerable.

“The challenge now for States is to acknowledge and protect these actors effectively”, she spelled out.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.