July 16, 2026 11:11 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Why introduce a new language in Class 9?' Supreme Court questions Centre's policy | 'Save Sonam Wangchuk's life': Delhi High Court to Centre as hunger strike enters Day 19 | Atul Kulkarni observes one-day fast in support of Sonam Wangchuk, urges Centre to initiate dialogue | Argentina stun England with late rally to storm into FIFA World Cup 2026 final | 'He could die in two days': Delhi HC plea seeks force-feeding of Sonam Wangchuk as fast enters Day 18 | 'Tonight's defeat is hard to take': Emmanuel Macron reacts after France crash out of World Cup, congratulates Spain | Spain cruise past France to storm into FIFA World Cup 2026 final with clinical 2-0 victory | Taslima Nasrin announces Kolkata return after 20 years to attend literary event at Rabindra Sadan | 'We must not watch one of our greatest minds be sacrificed': Zeenat Aman backs Sonam Wangchuk, urges govt to open dialogue | 'I don't want Phunsukh Wangdu to die': '3 Idiots' star Omi Vaidya's emotional appeal for Sonam Wangchuk
Education Policy
Supreme Court questions Centre over introduction of third language in Class 9. Photo: sci.gov.in

'Why introduce a new language in Class 9?' Supreme Court questions Centre's policy

| @indiablooms | Jul 16, 2026, at 03:17 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: The Supreme Court on Thursday expressed concern over the introduction of a third language in Class 9, observing that adding a new subject just before board examinations could place an unnecessary burden on students, media reports said.

The observation came while a bench led by Justice B.V. Nagarathna was hearing the Tamil Nadu government's appeal against a Madras High Court order directing the state to facilitate the establishment of Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas (JNVs) in every district.

'Class 9 Is Already Stressful': Supreme Court

During the hearing, Justice Nagarathna questioned the timing of introducing a third language at the secondary school level.

"No, that is very bad. Ninth standard is stressful. Why do you introduce a new language in 9th? You introduce it in 6th," the judge observed, as quoted by NDTV.

The court also urged the Centre to refrain from introducing a third language from Class 9, citing the academic pressure faced by students.

Tamil Nadu Reiterates Opposition to Three-Language Policy

Tamil Nadu, which has consistently opposed the establishment of JNVs, argued that its objection stems primarily from the three-language policy followed by these schools.

Representing the state, counsel submitted that the government has reservations over the implementation of the policy.

The bench, however, clarified that the policy does not mandate Hindi as the third language.

"The State language has to be taught, English has to be taught, and any third language. It doesn't say Hindi," Justice Nagarathna said, as quoted by NDTV.

Debate Over Language Choice

Appearing for the respondent, Advocate G. Priyadarshini argued that the National Education Policy (NEP) clearly states that no language should be imposed.

Responding to the submission, Justice Nagarathna remarked, "You don't want Hindi, but if it's Sanskrit, what is the issue?", according to the broadcaster.

Centre, Tamil Nadu Asked to Continue Dialogue

The court also advised the Tamil Nadu government not to reject every policy merely because it originates from the Union government, while urging both sides to continue discussions on the issue.

The bench, also comprising Justice R. Mahadevan, noted that talks between the Centre and the Tamil Nadu government regarding the establishment of JNVs are already underway and, therefore, judicial intervention is not required at this stage.

Separate Challenge to CBSE's Three-Language Policy Pending

Meanwhile, the CBSE's three-language policy has been challenged separately before the Supreme Court.

A bench headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant is scheduled to hear the plea in the coming days.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.