March 12, 2026 05:17 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Supreme Court allows first-ever passive euthanasia for 32-year-old man in coma for 13 years | As Iran-US war disrupts global gas supply, India issues guidelines to manage shortages | LPG crisis hits metros: Commercial cylinder shortage triggers panic as govt prioritises domestic supply | Iran war disrupts LPG supplies, restaurants in major Indian cities edge towards shutdown | ‘How dare you question judicial officers?’: SC raps Bengal SIR pleas, orders appellate tribunals for voter list appeals | 'Book withdrawn': NCERT apologises for controversial judiciary chapter after Supreme Court ban | Indian stock market surges as Brent crude dips below $100 after Trump’s Iran remarks | Australia grants asylum to five Iranian women footballers after anthem protest; Albanese says ‘they are safe here’ | Trump administration labels Afghanistan ‘state sponsor of wrongful detention’ | Trump threatens Iran with ‘20 times harder’ strike if oil flow through Strait of Hormuz is disrupted
Jana Nayagan
Vijay starrer Jana Nayagan release was delayed over a complaint. Photo: KVN Productions/X

New Delhi/IBNS: The makers of Vijay-starrer Jana Nayagan on Monday moved the Supreme Court challenging a Madras High Court interim order that stayed a single-judge directive asking the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) to grant a UA certificate to the film, media reports said.

A division bench of the High Court had deferred further hearing in the matter until January 21, after the Pongal holidays, effectively putting the film’s release on hold.

The interim stay came just hours after a single judge ordered the CBFC to issue a UA certificate following certain modifications by the filmmakers, while also criticising the board for entertaining complaints against the film and calling it a “dangerous trend”.

Soon after the order was passed, the CBFC filed an appeal and sought an urgent hearing before a division bench later the same day.

Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi appeared for the producers of Jana Nayagan, while Additional Solicitor General A.R.L. Sundaresan and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta represented the CBFC.

Arguing for the censor board, Sundaresan contended that the CBFC was not given an opportunity to file a counter-affidavit before the single judge passed the order. He also argued that while the producers had not challenged the CBFC chairman’s decision to refer the film to a Revising Committee, the single judge had nonetheless quashed that decision.

During the hearing, the Chief Justice questioned how such an order could be passed without allowing the CBFC to place its version on record. The court also noted that the CBFC has a statutory right to refer a film to a Revising Committee.

The film’s release, originally scheduled for January 9, was delayed after a complaint was submitted to the CBFC alleging that certain scenes hurt religious sentiments.

On January 7, KVN Productions announced the postponement of the release, citing “unavoidable circumstances beyond our control”, and assured audiences that a new release date would be announced soon.

Jana Nayagan, which also stars Bobby Deol and Pooja Hegde, was slated for a coordinated worldwide release, including markets such as the US, UK, Malaysia and Canada.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.