May 27, 2026 01:31 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘No option left’: Illegal Bangladeshi immigrants gather at Bengal border seeking return after BJP govt crackdown | Big strategic move: India and US join forces on rare earth supply chain | US military conducts new strikes on South Iran amid ceasefire: Reports | Piyush Goyal leads record India Inc mission to Canada to reboot economic ties | Suspended Bengal BDO on the run arrested after drunk-driving crash | ‘Pained by narrative of delayed probe’: SC hands over Twisha Sharma case to CBI, restrains media | West Asia conflict may hit Indian economy harder, warns Nirmala Sitharaman as fuel prices surge | Petrol, diesel prices hiked for 4th straight time | Honoured to visit the Missionaries of Charity today, says Rubio after Kolkata visit, arrives in Delhi | Marco Rubio's India visit begins in Kolkata: Trade, defence and Quad talks take centre stage
Bengal Polls
The Calcutta High Court order on ECI's transfer of Bengal officers is perceived as a jolt to TMC supremo Mamata Banerjee. Photo: ChatGPT/AITC X/Wikimedia/Gemini

‘Unsubstantial allegations’: Calcutta HC dismisses plea on ECI’s officer transfers in Bengal

| @indiablooms | Mar 31, 2026, at 03:40 pm

Kolkata/IBNS: The Calcutta High Court on Tuesday dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the Election Commission of India (ECI)’s large-scale transfer of IPS and IAS officers in West Bengal following the announcement of Assembly elections.

The court observed that the petitioner, advocate Arka Kumar Nag, had himself acknowledged the ECI’s authority, and therefore could not contest the poll body’s jurisdiction.

Chief Justice Sujoy Paul noted that the plea clearly recognised the Commission’s power to transfer officers to ensure free and fair elections, leaving no scope to dispute its authority.

The bench further held that it cannot question the “administrative wisdom” of the ECI unless there is clear evidence of arbitrariness, mala fide intent, or violation of statutory provisions.

Terming the allegations of mala fide as “unsubstantial”, the court rejected the state government’s claim that the transfers had led to administrative paralysis, noting that all transferred officers were promptly replaced.

Dismissing charges of vindictiveness and selective targeting of West Bengal, the court said data showed that a higher number of officers had been transferred in other poll-bound states.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.