December 31, 2025 03:06 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Amit Shah blasts TMC over border fencing; Mamata fires back on Pahalgam and Delhi blast | 'A profound loss for Bangladesh politics': Sheikh Hasina mourns Khaleda Zia’s death | PM Modi mourns Khaleda Zia’s death, hails her role in India-Bangladesh ties | Bangladesh’s first female Prime Minister Khaleda Zia passes away at 80 | India rejects Pakistan’s Christmas vandalism remarks, cites its ‘abysmal’ minority record | Minority under fire: Hindu houses torched in Bangladesh village | Supreme Court puts Aravalli redefinition on hold amid uproar, awaits new expert committee | Supreme Court strikes! Kuldeep Sengar’s bail in Unnao case suspended amid public outcry | From bitter split to big reunion! Pawars join hands again for high-stakes civic battle | CBI moves Supreme Court challenging Kuldeep Sengar's relief in Unnao rape case

Supreme Court suggests Parliament to consider harsher punishment for child abuse convicts

| | Jan 11, 2016, at 10:20 pm
New Delhi, Jan 11 (IBNS) While hearing a plea filed by the Supreme Court Women Lawyers Association (SCWLA), who is seeking castration as punishment for child abuse convicts, the Supreme Court (SC) on Monday suggested parliamentarians to consider awarding harsher punishment to those convicted of raping children.
As many as 892 cases of child rape have been registered in 2015, according to reports.
 
The SCWLA is of the opinion that only castration can be an effective deterrent against such heinous crimes.
 
According to media reports, in 2011, a Delhi judge had suggested chemical castration as punishment for rape. But the Justice Verma committee had rejected the demand. In 2015, the Madras High Court had suggested the Centre to consider castration as punishment for people convicted for child sex abuse.
 
SC has also suggested that the Parliament can also take a look at the definition of 'child'  in the context of rape. As of now, anyone below the age of 18 years is a 'child'.
 
The 'Nirbhaya' case has refreshed the debate regarding the minimum age of criminal responsibility in India.  

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.