June 27, 2026 03:58 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Ram Mandir Trust chief Champat Rai resigns as alleged donation siphoning row escalates | Ram Mandir fund row deepens: 8 arrested days after BJP called allegations 'false narrative' | 'Who tied the hands of CBI?': Calcutta HC on RG Kar case; victim's mother, now BJP MLA, says she is 'deeply disturbed' | Construction comes to a standstill at nearly 700 Kolkata projects after Taratala warehouse tragedy kills 15 | World Cup shocker! Ecuador stun Germany 2-1, storm into Round of 32 | Iran-US conflict: Cargo vessel hit near Strait of Hormuz, UN agency pauses evacuation operations | Amazon's massive India bet! Andy Jassy announces $48 billion investment after meeting PM Modi | Taratala warehouse collapse: Death toll climbs to 8, five arrested as SIT launches probe | Oil prices crash, IndiGo takes off! Aviation and fuel stocks emerge as biggest winners | Passport is a travel document, not conclusive proof of citizenship: MEA
Godhra Riot

Supreme Court reserves order on Zakia Jafri's plea in Godhra case

| @indiablooms | Dec 09, 2021, at 06:56 pm

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court on Thursday reserved its verdict on the Zakia Ahsan Jafri petition that sought fresh probe into the 2002 post-Godhra Gujarat riots alleging larger conspiracy involving politicians and police.

A three-judge bench of the apex court headed by Justice AM Khanwilkar reserved the judgement after hearing a detailed argument from Jafri, SIT and others.

Zakia, the wife of slain MP Ehsan Jafri, had moved the Supreme Court challenging the clean chit by the Special Investigation Team (SIT) to then Gujarat Chief Minister, Narendra Modi, in the riots cases.

Raising a number of questions on the manner in which the SIT had probed these riots cases in Gujarat, Kapil Sibal, senior lawyer for Zakia Jafri, questioned the SIT's action "despite all kinds of evidences and documents against all the accused persons in these riot cases in Gujarat".

Senior lawyer and former Attorney General (AG) of India, Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for the SIT, maintained that the probe team had conducted its investigation in a detailed manner and refuted the allegations by Sibal that the SIT failed in its duty to investigate the accused persons role in the Gujarat riots cases.

A three-judge bench led by Justice Khanwilkar has been hearing the case.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.