July 30, 2026 11:33 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Farmers storm Bhopal! Traffic crippled as protest over MSP intensifies | Supreme Court gives clean chit to Manmohan Singh in coal block scam case two years after death, accepts CBI closure report | Rahul Gandhi's 'student, idiot, andhbhakt' remark sparks uproar in Lok Sabha during anti-paper leak bill debate | Assam flood death toll climbs to 75; Over 3 lakh still affected as relief efforts intensify | 'You are simply useless': Kangana Ranaut hits back at CJP's Saurav Das in fresh Instagram attack | Assam floods: Death toll stays at 68 as over 5.24 lakh continue to battle deluge | 'Probe is meaningless if responsibility isn't fixed': Supreme Court slams Delhi Police over CJP protest crackdown | 'No protester will be left alone': CJP claims Centre shared FIR withdrawal copies after midnight talks | Bihar cop suspended after viral AK-47 firing video during NEET protest crackdown | After Dharmendra Pradhan's exit, 'E20 Janta Party' emerges, demands Nitin Gadkari's resignation over fuel policy
Image Credit: UNI

Supreme Court allows Travancore royal family to manage Padmanabhaswamy temple

| @indiablooms | Jul 13, 2020, at 07:24 pm

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court on Monday allowed the appeal filed by the Travancore royal family and also accepted its Shebayatship (right to manage deity's property) over the famous Padmanabhaswamy temple in Thiruvananthapuram in Kerala.

A bench headed by Justice U U Lalit passed the verdict through video-conferencing after hearing the submissions in the case.

"We allow the appeals filed by the Travancore Royal family (Maharaja), and we also accept the Shebayatship of Travancore Royal family over the famous Padmanabhaswamy temple," the apex court said in its verdict.

The district judge, who was the executive officer appointed by the apex court, will continue to work and function as the administrative head of the temple, it said.

The top court's ruling effectively means that the "Ruler" under Instrument of Accession signed by the Princely state ruler with the Government of India at the time of independence is "ruler" by succession and will not end with the death of the ruler who signed the instrument of accession.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.