April 09, 2026 03:21 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Jaishankar’s high-stakes diplomatic tour: EAM to visit UAE this week, first visit amid Middle East conflict | Passport row: Barricades outside Pawan Khera’s Hyderabad house after Himanta Biswa Sarma's warning | ‘Allow excluded voters to vote’: Mamata slams voter list freeze amid SIR row, to move Supreme Court | US, Iran agree to 2-week ceasefire deal, reopening Strait of Hormuz | ‘Prudent to wait and watch’: RBI keeps repo rate unchanged at 5.25% amid global volatility | 91 lakh voters dropped from rolls in Bengal SIR; Muslim-majority Murshidabad tops deletion list | Air India CEO Campbell Wilson quits amid losses, regulatory heat after deadly Ahmedabad crash: Report | Could be taken out in one night: Donald Trump’s chilling warning to Iran as deadline approaches | IRGC Intelligence Chief Majid Khademi killed in Israeli-US strike | Setback for Arunachal CM Pema Khandu as SC orders CBI probe into public works contracts

SC refuses to transfer AIADMK MLAs' disqualification case

| @indiablooms | Jun 27, 2018, at 12:52 pm

New Delhi, Jun 27 (IBNS): The Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to transfer from the Madras High Court the case pertaining to the disqualification of 18 AIADMK MLAs, media reports said.

A two-member vacation bench of justices Arun Mishra and SK Kaul, however, appointed Justice M Sathyanarayanan as the third judge in the Madras HC, to decide on the petition filed by 18 AIADMK MLAs against their disqualification.

The MLAs had sought transfer of their case from the Madras High Court to the Supreme Court after the split verdict by the high court on June 14.

While the Chief Justice of Madras HC Indira Banerjee upheld the disqualification order passed by Tamil Nadu Assembly Speaker P Dhanapal, Justice M Sundar quashed the speaker’s order for disqualification.

Justice Banerjee said in view of the contradicting judgements, the case will now be transferred to a different bench. The majority view would be considered the judgement.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.