July 07, 2026 03:34 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
China tests ballistic missile from nuclear submarine in Pacific: Australia, New Zealand respond | Baruipur horror: Main accused in alleged rape and murder of minor girl arrested; senior cops dissatisfied with handling of the case | Defence stocks jump after Rs 52,000 crore DAC approval sparks buying frenzy | 'Harry Kane is a great player': Donald Trump after England knocked Mexico out of the World Cup | 'Referee gave a lot against us': Harry Kane reacts after England's dramatic win over Mexico | England hold nerve with 10 men to knock out Mexico in five-goal World Cup classic | 'Why can't citizens protest against the government? They are being made slaves by slapping cases': Bombay HC slams Mumbai Police, quashes activist's externment | 'First he cheats on me...': Siya Goyal's old pub video goes viral amid probe into fiancé Ketan Agarwal's alleged murder | Ronaldo's goal, Ramos' last-gasp winner send Portugal past Croatia, set up Spain clash | India-US trade deal almost done! Piyush Goyal hints at breakthrough
Originally released on ZEE5 last Friday, Satluj was taken down within days over sensitive content. Photo: X/Diljit Dosanjh

Satluj controversy: Lawyer seeks FIR against Diljit Dosanjh over alleged 'pro-terror narrative' portrayal

| @indiablooms | Jul 07, 2026, at 12:24 am

A fresh controversy has erupted around actor-singer Diljit Dosanjh’s film Satluj (earlier titled Punjab 95) after a lawyer filed a complaint with the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA), demanding an FIR against the film’s makers and OTT platform ZEE5.

Advocate Vineet Jindal has alleged that the film promotes “terrorism, violent extremism, and separatist ideology” linked to Punjab’s militancy era, and has urged authorities to initiate legal action under multiple provisions, including the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, UAPA, and IT Act.

Allegations of bypassing CBFC process

In his complaint, Jindal claimed the filmmakers deliberately avoided the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) process by changing the film’s title from Punjab 95 to Satluj and releasing it directly on OTT.

He alleged that the CBFC had reportedly sought 127 cuts, which the makers did not fully comply with before the digital release.

Claims of 'distorted history' and security concerns

The complaint further argues that the film depicts Punjab’s insurgency period in a manner that could “glorify extremism” and distort historical facts.

It also claims such portrayals may hurt sentiments, undermine security forces, and disturb public order.

Authorities and sources have also previously flagged concerns that certain portions of the film could potentially be misused by anti-national elements, leading to its removal from ZEE5 shortly after release.

Film withdrawn from OTT platform

Originally released on ZEE5 last Friday, Satluj was taken down within days following what sources described as a careful review over sensitive content concerns.

The film is based on the life of human rights activist Jaswant Singh Khalra, who exposed alleged extrajudicial killings and secret cremations during Punjab’s militancy years.

Political row intensifies

The removal has triggered sharp political reactions in Punjab. Shiromani Akali Dal leader Bikram Singh said the ban has only increased public curiosity about the film’s subject.

AAP MP Malwinder Singh Kang called the move reflective of a “deep discomfort with Punjab’s truth,” while Congress MLA Sukhpal Khaira said the story is based on facts acknowledged by the Supreme Court.

Diljit Dosanjh responds

Reacting to the controversy, Diljit Dosanjh said that what happened to Satluj mirrors the struggles faced by the film’s central character, suggesting parallels between the story and the current backlash.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.