December 05, 2025 10:53 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
In front of Putin, PM Modi makes bold statement on Russia-Ukraine war: ‘India is not neutral, we side with peace!’ | Rupee weakens following RBI repo rate cut | RBI slashes repo rate by 25 basis points — big relief coming for borrowers! | 'Mamata fooled Muslims': Humayun Kabir explodes after TMC suspends him over 'Babri Masjid-style mosque' demand; announces new party | Mosque in the middle of Kolkata airport? Centre confirms flight risks, BJP fires at Mamata | Sam Altman is betting big on India! OpenAI in advanced talks with Tata to build AI infrastructure | Government removes mandatory pre-installation of Sanchar Saathi App. Know all details | Calcutta HC overturns controversial Bengal job annulment — 32,000 teachers rejoice! | Bengal SIR shock: 1 lakh ‘deceased voters’ found in Kolkata North! | Massive twist in Bengal voter list: ‘Perfect’ 2,280 booths shrink to just 480 after probe!
Nayanthara
Nayanthara in the Netflix documentary | Photo: Nayanthara/X

Nayanthara's Netflix docu in fresh trouble as Madras HC asks makers to respond to use of Chandramukhi clips

| @indiablooms | Sep 10, 2025, at 02:25 pm

Chennai/IBNS: In a fresh trouble for Tamil superstar Nayanthara, the Madras High Court on Wednesday asked the makers of her Netflix documentary to respond to a plea filed against the usage of clips from blockbuster film Chandramukhi, media reports said.

The documentary, which was released on November 18, 2024 coinciding the actress' 40th birthday, was developed in association with Rowdy Pictures, the production banner co-founded and run by Nayanthara and her husband Vignesh Shivan. 

AB International, which owns the copyright of Chandramukhi, has accused the makers of the documentary Nayanthara: Beyond the Fairy Tale of using clipping from the Rajinikanth-Jyothika starrer film without taking any permission.

Nayanthara played a key role in Chandramukhi, which was released in 2005.

The film's makers alleged that the documentary is still streaming on the popular OTT app with the particular clippings despite serving a legal notice demanding the removal of the sequences and Rs. 5 crore in damages, NDTV reported.

The Chandramukhi makers had filed the plea seeking a court order seeking restrain on Tarc Studios from using the clippings, removing them from the documentary and furnishing the details of the money generated as profits.

While Tarc Studios claimed it was participating in a dialogue with AB International to resolve the dispute, the Chandramukhi makers trashed such assertions.

The Madras HC has asked Tarc Studios to file its response by October 6, when the next hearing will be held.

Earlier, the release of the documentary was embroiled with controversy after Dhanush, who was the producer of the film Naanum Rowdy Dhaan, slapped a legal notice against Nayanthara and demanded Rs. 10 crore as compensation from the actress for using a clip of the film in the show's trailer.

Nayanthara responded with a fiery three-page open letter on Instagram, expressing shock at the demand for Rs 10 crore over "mere three seconds" of footage, which she claimed consisted of behind-the-scenes (BTS) visuals shot on personal devices.

In her letter, Nayanthara criticised Dhanush for what she called an "all-time low" and stated her intent to respond legally.

She alleged that Dhanush had repeatedly refused permission to include songs or visuals from Naanum Rowdy Dhaan in the documentary despite multiple requests.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.