January 07, 2026 10:26 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
TMC moves Supreme Court against ECI over SIR, alleges ‘WhatsApp Commission’ in voter revision | Madurai HC shocks DMK! Hilltop Karthigai Deepam allowed, court slams ‘unnecessary politicisation’ – Hindus celebrate big victory! | Suresh Kalmadi, ex-Union Minister and controversial Commonwealth Games chief, passes away at 81 | Bangladesh bans IPL telecast after KKR drops Mustafizur Rahman | ‘Qualitatively different’: Supreme Court shuts bail door on Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam in Delhi riots case | ‘Modi is a good guy,’ says Trump — then comes the tariff threat over Russian oil | Oil stocks surge after US strike on Venezuela — ONGC, RIL in sharp focus | ‘Epicentre of misgovernance’: Rahul Gandhi blasts Madhya Pradesh govt over deadly water contamination | After Mamdani's letter, 8 US lawmakers push 'fair trial' for Umar Khalid amid UAPA case | ‘Bad neighbours’: Jaishankar shreds Pakistan, defends India’s right to act against cross-border terror
Modi surname case
Image Credit : Facebook/ Rahul Gandhi

'Modi surname' defamation case: SC issues notice to complainant BJP leader Purnesh Modi

| @indiablooms | Jul 22, 2023, at 05:43 am

New Delhi/IBNS: The Supreme Court on Friday issued notice to complainant Gujarat BJP legislator Purnesh Modi after hearing the appeal filed by Congress leader Rahul Gandhi challenging the Gujarat High Court's order declining to stay his conviction in the criminal defamation case in which he was sentenced to two years in jail by Surat court over 'Modi surname' remark.

A two-judge bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Justice B R Gavai and also comprising Justice Prashant K Mishra, issued notice to the respondent, Purnesh Modi and sought his detailed response within 10 days on Rahul's appeal.

"We will issue notice, returnable in 10 days, time," the apex court said, and fixed the matter for further hearing on August 4.

During the course of the hearing, Justice Gavai, offered to recuse from the case on the ground that his father has had an association of 40 years with the Congress. He was elected with help from Congress. "My brother is in active politics. You all (parties) take a call," he added.

Senior lawyer Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Rahul, said, that's a fair comment. "We don't have an issue," he added.

He argued that Rahul has already lost 111 days as an MP from Wayanad constuency and apprehended that EC may announce bypoll soon.

"Rahul could not attend the last Parliament session and now stands to be out of the ongoing session. Please consider granting interim stay on his conviction," he said.

The Congress leader and disqualified Lok Sabha MP had on July 15 knocked on the doors of the Supreme Court challenging the Gujarat High Court's order dismissing his plea to stay his conviction in the criminal defamation case over the 'Modi surname' remark.

He had moved the top court, seeking a stay on the Gujarat HC's verdict dismissing his appeal to stay his conviction in the criminal defamation case over the 'Modi surname.'

Gujarat High Court's Single-judge Justice Hemant M Prachchhak, who had reserved the judgement on May 2, pronounced the verdict on July 7.

[With UNI inputs]

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.