August 20, 2026 09:16 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Jadavpur erupts again: ABVP-SFI clash, police barricades shattered as fresh tension grips area | Ex-Congress MP and 1984 anti-Sikh riots convict Sajjan Kumar dies while serving life sentence | India hits back at Pakistan: Structures outside High Commission demolished in Delhi | ‘Don’t daydream about my bedroom’: Kangana Ranaut fires back at Ramdev over ‘Gen Z’ row | Jadavpur University erupts at midnight: ABVP-Left student groups clash over meeting, BJP-CPI(M) leaders trade barbs | Vijay govt calls for action to stop students, youth from joining CJP, Left protests | Kolkata hotel fire kills 9: Bengal Minister Agnimitra Paul targets ex-TMC govt, CESC over licences | Kolkata hotel fire: 9 Bangladeshi nationals, including women and a child, die in massive blaze | Tarun Tejpal faces life term? Goa govt moves Supreme Court after 2013 rape conviction | Supreme Court rejects ‘less painful’ death penalty plea, but leaves door open for future change

Gujarat assembly passes draconian anti-terror and crime bill

| | Mar 31, 2015, at 07:50 pm
Ahmedabad, Mar 31 (IBNS) Amid a walkout by the Opposition the Gujarat Assembly on Tuesday passed a controversial anti-terror bill that was in the past rejected by two former Indian presidents.

The Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime Bill was passed in the state Assembly by the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on Tuesday.

The bill is similar to the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA).

In the past former President AJP Abdul Kalam and Pratibha Patil had refused to sign off the proposal and had suggested some amendments.

The bill was thus passed for the fourth time in past 12 years.

Gujarat junior Home Minister Rajni Patel was quoted saying that the bill is necessary to control not only terrorism but also organized crime.

The bill reportedly gives too much power to the police and confessions to cops, phone call interceptions and recordings are admissible evidence under this Bill if it was made into a law, said its opponents.

Human rights activists slammed the bill saying it will lead to custodial torture. 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.