April 17, 2026 04:18 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Bengal SIR: Supreme Court allows voters restored by tribunal till April 21 and 27 to vote | 'Women won't spare you': PM Modi warns Opposition over resistance to quota bill | Vijay booked in 3 cases over poll code violation ahead of Tamil Nadu polls | 'Black law': Stalin burns copy of 'delimitation' bill, slams Modi govt | TCS halts Nashik BPO operations amid sexual abuse, conversion allegations | ‘We are surprised’: SC stays Pawan Khera’s bail over remarks on Himanta Biswa Sarma’s wife | Historic shift: Bihar gets first BJP CM as Samrat Choudhary takes oath | 'ECI deviated from Bihar procedure': Supreme Court raises concerns over voter deletion in Bengal SIR | Noida workers’ protest turns violent: Stones pelted, vehicles damaged over wage hike demand | Oil prices jump above $103 a barrel as US moves to block Iran-linked shipping

Gay sex: The tale of two Asian cities

| | May 24, 2017, at 08:52 pm
New Delhi, May 24 (IBNS): A day after two men were publicly caned for having gay sex in Aceh, Indonesia, for a breach of Islamic Law, another Asian country is on the brink of history for legalising same sex marriages.

If reports are to be believed, Taiwan judges will decide whether to allow same sex marriage in the country and if they pass the law, it will become the first Asian country to do so.

Such is the state of gay men in Asia, while one gets caned for 'not adhering to law' the other can bask in glory and be open about it.

The news of two men having sex in Indonesia came to the lime light after a vigilante group filmed them doing the act, thus raising the all important question, "Where do you draw the line" when it comes to privacy and choosing one's own partner.

What is so horrific about the caning is not just the nature of the punishment, in which the supposed 'law-breakers' were slapped 83 times, but the onlookers asking for a stricter punishment as 'a lesson for others'.

"Let this be a lesson to you," shouted a man who witness the public prosecution in Indonesia.

A BBC report read that the guilty was horrified and wanted the punishment to be over as soon as possible.

"I just want the caning to be over and to go back to my family, I have been deeply depressed. I am trying to pull myself out of a deep black hole," he was quoted as saying by the network.

In a contrasting note, Taiwanese equal rights activist Chi Chia-wei says he's excited about the latest development in his country.

"I feel 100% confident about a positive outcome," he told AFP news agency.

"I am optimistic but I wouldn't be overly excited. This should have happened long ago,' he added.

Chia-wei has been fighting this battle since 1986.

So what prompted the Aceh government to cane a man for loving another? Religion.

Aceh is unlike the other provinces in Indonesia, it still has Sharia rule and is uber conservative.

While other places in Indonesia does not convict homosexuality, Aceh was granted special rights to introduce its own stricter Islamic laws more than a decade ago, thus allowing it to choose its own form of punishment (read public humiliation and demolition of basic rights).

According to a 2011 data, Indonesia houses around 202.9 million Muslims, which is 87.2 percent of its total population.

The number today is expected to rise.

What is also following a steep rise in the country is their hatred towards the homosexual community.

In recent years, atrocities against the LGBTQ community in Indonesia have been widely reportedly in the media.

The caning has received widespread criticism from rights watchdogs.

Amnesty International has slammed it as a "cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment".

So much for loving a man!


(Writing by Sudipto Maity)

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.