January 23, 2026 07:17 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Insult' in Kochi, silence in Delhi: Shashi Tharoor likely to skip key Congress meeting as party tensions surface | Outrage in America: ICE detains 5-year-old after he comes home from preschool | Top Maoist leader with ₹2 crore bounty among 16 eliminated in major Jharkhand encounter | Shockwave at Amazon: 14,000 jobs could be cut as early as next week! | Deloitte set to rename jobs of 1.8 lakh employees as AI forces big consulting reset | 'Bigger than tariffs': Ex-IMF economist Gita Gopinath flags pollution as India’s biggest economic threat | SC allows both Hindus and Muslims to pray at disputed Bhojshala in Madhya Pradesh on Basant Panchami | 'Second group? no chance': Ashwini Vaishnaw says India is a top AI power, slams IMF at Davos | Twist before Tamil Nadu polls! TTV Dhinakaran returns to NDA after bitter exit | Gold goes berserk! Prices smash all-time high as global tensions explode

FIR lodged against Maria Sharapova over Gurugram housing project

| @indiablooms | Nov 03, 2017, at 06:16 pm

Gurugram, Nov 3 (IBNS): An FIR has been lodged against tennis icon Maria Sharapova for endorsing a housing project in Gurugram which never took off, media reports said.

 

The housing project, endorsed by Sharapova, was expected to be finished by 2016.

The complaint has been lodged by a Gurgaon-based Bhawana Agarwal against Sharapova along with the company Homestead Infrastructure Development, Homestead Infrastructure Maintenance and Homestead Arabic Homes.

Agarwal has lodged the complaint in a Delhi court through her lawyer Piyush Singh.

The court has now ordered an FIR against the Russian tennis player and others against whom the complaints were lodged.

Agarwal said in a statement that she was "lured" by the developers who had given the advertisement as a "Ballet of Sharapova".

"If the averments of the complainant are to be believed, it shows that nothing has happened on the said project and alleged persons have no licence or sanction for construction or development at the project, for which the complainant paid Rs 53.03 lakh" the court said, according to media reports.

 

Image: Wikimedia Commons

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.