December 17, 2025 01:50 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Goa nightclub fire horror: Luthra brothers brought back to India from Thailand, arrested | Messi chaos costs minister his job: Aroop Biswas resigns after Salt Lake Stadium fiasco | Bengal SIR draft list out: Around 58 lakh voters’ names dropped | Relief for Sonia, Rahul Gandhi as Delhi court refuses to act on ED chargesheet in National Herald case | Centre moves to replace MGNREGA with 'G Ram G', sets stage for winter session showdown | Messi surrounded by VIPs, fans rage: Five held in stadium vandalism case | 'Messi was uncomfortable, lost his cool!': Ex-India footballer reveals what really happened at chaotic Kolkata stadium | PM Modi embarks on historic three-nation visit to Jordan, Ethiopia, and Oman | Caught in Thailand! Fugitive Goa nightclub owners detained after deadly fire kills 25 | After Putin’s blockbuster Delhi visit, Modi set to host German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in January
Image courtesy: wikipedia.org

Disapproval of marriage does not amount to abetment of suicide, rules Supreme Court

| @indiablooms | Jan 26, 2025, at 07:47 pm

New Delhi: Disapproving a marriage does not amount to abetment of suicide under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the Supreme Court has ruled.

A bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma made this observation while quashing a chargesheet against a woman accused of abetting the suicide of another woman allegedly in love with her son, PTI reported.

The case stemmed from disputes between the deceased and the appellant's son, who had refused to marry her, according to the report.

The appellant was accused of opposing the marriage and making disparaging remarks against the deceased.

"Even if the appellant expressed her disapproval towards the marriage of Babu Das and the deceased, it does not rise to the level of direct or indirect instigation of abetting suicide," the bench observed, according to the report.

It further stated that a remark such as suggesting the deceased should not live if she cannot marry her lover does not constitute abetment.

"There needs to be a positive act that creates an environment where the deceased is pushed to the edge in order to sustain the charge of section 306, IPC," the bench noted, reported PTI

The court highlighted that the deceased's family had also expressed unhappiness with the relationship, and mere disapproval of a marriage does not satisfy the requirements of instigation necessary to invoke Section 306 IPC.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.