December 13, 2025 11:56 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Caught in Thailand! Fugitive Goa nightclub owners detained after deadly fire kills 25 | After Putin’s blockbuster Delhi visit, Modi set to host German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in January | Delhi High Court slams govt, orders swift compensation as IndiGo crisis triggers fare shock and nationwide chaos | Amazon drops a massive $35 billion India bet! AI push, 1 million jobs and big plans revealed at Smbhav Summit | IndiGo’s ‘All OK’ claim falls apart! Govt slaps 10% flight cut after weeklong chaos | Centre finally aligns IndiGo flights with airline's operating ability, cuts its winter schedule by 5% | Odisha's Malkangiri in flames: Tribals rampage Bangladeshi settlers village after beheading horror! | Race against time! Indian Navy sends four more warships to Cyclone Ditwah-hit Sri Lanka | $2 billion mega deal! HD Hyundai to build shipyard in Tamil Nadu — a game changer for India | After 8 years of legal drama, Malayalam actor Dileep acquitted in 2017 rape case — what really happened?
Rahul Gandhi is facing defamation charge for allegedly referring to Veer Savarkar as 'servant of British'. Photo courtesy: Official Facebook

Court imposes Rs. 200 fine on Rahul Gandhi for skipping appearance in Savarakar defamatory remark case

| @indiablooms | Mar 06, 2025, at 01:30 am

Lucknow/IBNS: A Lucknow Court on Wednesday imposed a fine of Rs. 200 on Congress leader Rahul Gandhi for repeatedly failing to appear before it in connection with a case related to his remarks on freedom fighter Veer Savarkar.

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM) also issued a strict warning, directing Gandhi to appear before the court on April 14, 2025.

The judge said if Gandhi fails to appear again, he could face legal consequences.

The case originated based on a complaint filed by Nripendra Pandey, who objected to a statement made by Rahul Gandhi during a press conference in Maharashtra on December 17, 2022.

Gandhi had then allegedly referred to Veer Savarkar as "a servant of the British" and "a pension receiver."

The complainant argued that these remarks were inflammatory and aimed at inciting enmity in society.

He also claimed that pamphlets containing similar comments were distributed among journalists at the event.

A demand was made to register a case against Gandhi under Sections 153(A) and 505 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly promoting discord through his statements.

During Wednesday's hearing, Gandhi's lawyer, Pranshu Agrawal, filed an application seeking an exemption from his appearance.

He stated that Gandhi, as the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, had a pre-scheduled meeting with a foreign dignitary on the same day and was preoccupied with official responsibilities.

The lawyer assured the court that Gandhi was not deliberately avoiding the hearing and respected the judicial process.

The court, however, did not take Gandhi's absence lightly and imposed a Rs. 200 fine. It ordered his mandatory appearance on April 14, 2025, cautioning that failure to comply could result in the issuance of a non-bailable warrant.

Besides the Savarkar-related case, Rahul Gandhi is also facing another legal challenge stemming from a statement he made during an economic survey in the run-up to the Lok Sabha elections.

Pankaj Pathak, president of the All India Hindu Federation Mandal, filed a complaint in June 2024, alleging that Gandhi's comments regarding the distribution of wealth hurt religious sentiments.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.