April 20, 2026 02:57 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Pushback from smartphone makers: Centre drops Aadhaar app pre-install plan — report | Meta eyes first wave of layoffs on May 20: Report | TCS breaks silence on Nida Khan: ‘No HR role, no power’ in Nashik case | ‘Panic reaction’: Rahul Gandhi on women’s bill, says PM Modi ‘wants to send a message’ | Adani Group shares rise as Gautam Adani becomes Asia’s richest, overtakes Mukesh Ambani | TCS Nashik ‘conversion’ case accused seeks anticipatory bail citing pregnancy | IT raids TMC candidate Debasish Kumar’s premises ahead of Bengal polls | Bengal SIR: Supreme Court allows voters restored by tribunal till April 21 and 27 to vote | 'Women won't spare you': PM Modi warns Opposition over resistance to quota bill | Vijay booked in 3 cases over poll code violation ahead of Tamil Nadu polls

Compensation for sexual harassment not taxable : IT Tribunal on Sushmita Sen case

| @indiablooms | Nov 20, 2018, at 04:02 pm

Mubai, Nov 20 (IBNS) :The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has ruled that no tax liability arises over compensation received by a victim of sexual harassment, reported News18.

This ruling was delivered by the quasi-judicial body while hearing the tax-related case of actor Sushmita Sen.

The actor had received Rs. 95 lakh as part of the settlement with the beverage company, Coca-Cola in 2003-04. She had alleged sexual harassment by one of the company’s employees. The Tribunal had marked the compensation as a “capital receipt” for Sushmita Sen and thus could not be taxed like an income.

The actor, who has played roles in blockbuster Bollywood movies like Main Hoon Na and was crowned Miss Universe in 1994 at the age of 18, had entered into a promotional deal with Coca-Cola worth Rs 1.5 crore. However, the contract ended prematurely and she got Rs 1.45 crore from Coca-Cola as the final settlement for sexual harassment allegations.

But the actor only showed Rs 50 lakh as income and the rest as capital gains.

Concurring with this, the Tribunal stated, “The only logical deduction was that the company accepted the contention of the assessee of the alleged sexual harassment and paid the compensation to avoid negative publicity/embarrassment which would have jeopardised the business of the company world over. The additional compensation was not towards the service rendered and did not arise out of the contractual terms.”

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.