August 16, 2026 11:55 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
After SC rebuke, BCI chief apologises to NALSAR students over enrolment freeze row | Independence Day: PM Modi’s big youth pitch— AI training, free coaching amid exam row and job concerns | ‘Shakti Ki Saptadhara’: Modi reveals 7 pillars to power India’s next leap in his I-Day speech from Red Fort | West Bengal STF arrests 3 more suspected Pakistani spies in Cooch Behar | Bengal man arrested in Bengaluru over terror links, Afghanistan travel plan | Ajit Doval breaks silence on Operation Sindoor in Discovery’s explosive new docuseries | Rahul Gandhi's 'mock hug' taunt sparks row; Centre stresses 'mutual respect' with Italy | Delhi on high alert: Bomb threat to High Court, airport and multiple locations ahead of I-Day | ‘Who are they to interfere?’: CJI Surya Kant slams Bar Council of India over NALSAR students’ enrolment row | 'Shows how low Congress has sunk': BJP slams Rahul Gandhi over Modi foreign policy jibe
Sedition

Centre seeks more time to respond to sedition pleas

| @indiablooms | May 02, 2022, at 08:20 pm

New Delhi/UNI: The central government on Monday sought more time from the Supreme Court to file its detailed written submissions on a batch of petitions challenging the Constitutional validity of the sedition law (Section 124-A of the Indian Penal Code).

The court had on April 27 asked the Union of India to file its counter by the end of this week but the Centre requested additional time to file its response.

The Centre filed an application before the Supreme Court and pleaded that the reply was ready but a sanction was needed from a department for which it needed more time in the matter.

Senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, for one of the petitioners, said he was relying on three books in the sedition case.

He wanted the books to be taken on record.

A Bench headed by Chief Justice N V Ramana had on April 27 asked the Centre to file its counter by the end of this week and posted the batch of petitions for final hearing on May 5 and said no adjournment will be granted on that day.

The petitions argue that what constitutes seditious speech sparked a tussle between free speech and law on sedition which has been underway since the colonial era.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.