May 21, 2026 11:28 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Big twist in RG Kar case! Calcutta HC orders fresh probe into evidence destruction allegations | Pulwama mastermind Hamza Burhan shot dead in PoK by unknown gunmen: Reports | NIA arrests Kolkata man for spying for Pakistan intelligence network | Cockroach Janta Party X handle withheld! Founder Abhijeet Dipke launches comeback account | Bengal govt makes Vande Mataram compulsory in all madrasas, extends school directive | RBI on alert! Interest rate hike may be coming as rupee crashes to fresh low | Big relief for Maharashtra employees! Fadnavis govt hikes DA to 60% | Twisha Sharma death mystery deepens as crucial evidence ‘not shared’ during autopsy: Report | Balcony Smiles, Colosseum Walks and ‘Melodi’ Magic: Modi-Meloni Chemistry Has The Internet Swooning Again | Big relief signal for Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam? Supreme Court questions earlier bail denial
The Calcutta HC refused to quash the Bengal govt notification. Photo: ChatGPT.

Calcutta High Court upholds Bengal’s new cow slaughter rules ahead of Bakri-Eid

| @indiablooms | May 21, 2026, at 10:34 pm

The Calcutta High Court has upheld the West Bengal government’s recent order regulating animal slaughter ahead of the Id-Uz-Zoha festival, popularly known as Bakri-Eid, dismissing multiple petitions challenging the notification.

The ruling comes amid a political and legal row over new restrictions imposed by the Government of West Bengal on the slaughter of cows, bulls, buffaloes and calves.

What the new government order says

The notification, issued on May 13 by the government led by Suvendu Adhikari, mandates that no animal can be slaughtered without a fitness certificate issued jointly by authorised local officials and a government veterinary surgeon.

The rules apply to cows, bulls, buffaloes, calves and other animals typically sacrificed during the festival.

Petitioners had argued that the fresh conditions went beyond the scope of the 1950 law governing animal slaughter and were inconsistent with existing rules.

High Court refuses to strike down notice

A Division Bench headed by Chief Justice Sujoy Paul refused to stay or quash the notification, observing that the 2026 order was substantially based on directions issued by the High Court itself in the 2018 case of Rajyashree Chaudhuri vs State of West Bengal.

The Bench noted that the earlier ruling had attained finality since it was never challenged before a higher court.

Fitness certificate mandatory

Reaffirming the conditions laid down earlier, the court said animals cannot be slaughtered without a fitness certificate.

The certificate must be jointly issued by a municipal chairman or panchayat authority along with a veterinary surgeon after verifying:

  • The animal is above 14 years of age
  • It is not permanently incapacitated due to injury, disease or age
  • Slaughter In Public Places Prohibited

The court further clarified that slaughter can only take place at authorised municipal slaughterhouses or locations approved by local authorities.

It directed the state government to explicitly add two key clauses from the 2018 order into the 2026 notification:

Slaughter of cows, buffaloes or other animals in public places is strictly prohibited
Cow sacrifice is not considered an essential religious practice in Islam, citing the Supreme Court judgment in Mohd. Hanif Quareshi vs State of Bihar

Court flags administrative gaps

The Bench also pointed to shortcomings in the state’s infrastructure for implementing the rules effectively.
The judges observed that the government must ensure a proper mechanism for issuing slaughter certificates and maintaining authorised slaughterhouse facilities across West Bengal.
The court expressed hope that gaps in implementation would be addressed quickly, especially with the festival approaching.
 
State asked to decide exemption pleas within 24 hours

Taking note of the urgency surrounding the upcoming religious festival, the court directed the state government to take a decision within 24 hours on exemption requests filed by some petitioners.

The Bench also remarked that a law that has remained in force for more than 76 years carries a strong presumption of constitutionality unless proven otherwise.
 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.