August 03, 2026 07:53 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'It was a conspiracy': Brij Bhushan reacts after acquittal in wrestlers' sexual harassment case | After NEET protests, CJP backs Jharkhand students' agitation over alleged JPSC-JSSC exam irregularities | Brij Bhushan acquitted: Delhi Court clears ex-WFI chief in high-profile wrestlers' sexual harassment case | India finishes 4th at Commonwealth Games 2026 with 39 medals despite missing medal-rich sports | Kulgam terror attack turns deadlier: Second Chhattisgarh worker succumbs to bullet injuries | 'I'm ashamed': Girl who abused PM Modi during NEET protests issues apology | 'Abuses never solve anything': PM Modi urges forgiveness after Jantar Mantar protest slogans | 'Country wanted an apology, PM forgave it': Congress' sharp swipe at Modi's video over 'abuse' row | Bengal STF arrests JeM suspect from Burdwan; probe underway into 'plot' targeting CM Suvendu Adhikari | 'My father was almost lynched': Families of Delhi cops assaulted during NEET protests share chilling accounts

Ayodhya verdict: Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind files review petition

| @indiablooms | Dec 02, 2019, at 05:22 pm

New Delhi/UNI/IBNS: Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind, through Maulana Syed Ashhad Rashidi, the legal heir of the original plaintiff in the Ramjanmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land (Title) dispute, on Monday filed a review petition against the Supreme Court's judgement on the Ayodhya case.

A five-judge constitution bench had given the judgement.

Maulana Syed Ashhad Rashidi, legal heir of original Ayodhya land dispute litigant M Siddiq, filed the 217-page petition in the apex court seeking review of its November 9 judgment giving disputed land to Ram Lalla.

The main contention in the review petition of JUH is the title granted by 'disregarding' documentary evidence.

It has not been listed yet before the Supreme Court but may come up for hearing after Dec 9 and within a period of 15 days.

A five-judge constitution bench of the apex court had decreed that the disputed land be given to the Hindu side and a five-acre area in a different place to the Muslim side. 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.