June 26, 2026 07:01 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Ram Mandir Trust chief Champat Rai resigns as alleged donation siphoning row escalates | Ram Mandir fund row deepens: 8 arrested days after BJP called allegations 'false narrative' | 'Who tied the hands of CBI?': Calcutta HC on RG Kar case; victim's mother, now BJP MLA, says she is 'deeply disturbed' | Construction comes to a standstill at nearly 700 Kolkata projects after Taratala warehouse tragedy kills 15 | World Cup shocker! Ecuador stun Germany 2-1, storm into Round of 32 | Iran-US conflict: Cargo vessel hit near Strait of Hormuz, UN agency pauses evacuation operations | Amazon's massive India bet! Andy Jassy announces $48 billion investment after meeting PM Modi | Taratala warehouse collapse: Death toll climbs to 8, five arrested as SIT launches probe | Oil prices crash, IndiGo takes off! Aviation and fuel stocks emerge as biggest winners | Passport is a travel document, not conclusive proof of citizenship: MEA
Anil Deshmukh

Anil Deshmukh again sent to ED custody

| @indiablooms | Nov 08, 2021, at 12:48 am

Mumbai/UNI: The Bombay High Court on Sunday set aside a Special PMLA Court order granting 14 days' judicial custody to former Maharashtra home minister Anil Deshmukh and remanded him back to the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for five days.

Vacation Judge Justice MJ Jamdar on Sunday passed an order in response to an urgent plea filed by the ED, challenging Special Court Judge PR Sitre's ruling on Saturday, declining the agency's plea for extension of Deshmukh's custody by nine more days.

Deshmukh's lawyers Senior Advocate Vikram Chaudhri and Aniket Nikam submitted to the court that without getting into merits or maintainability of the ED application, they were volunteering cooperation and not shying away from the investigation and hence, not objecting to the further remand.

ED's lawyers, Additional Solicitor-General Anil Singh and Advocate Shreeram Shirsat argued in the Bombay High Court that they were not granted further custody by the Special PMLA Court, thus denial of sufficient and adequate opportunity to probe the case having serious ramifications and when the investigations are at a crucial state.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.