March 24, 2025 10:45 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Allahabad HC directs Centre to decide on Rahul Gandhi's dual citizenship row by April 21 | Nagpur communal violence: Suspected mastermind Fahim Khan's house faces bulldozer action | Habitat Studio announces shutdown after Shinde-led Shiv Sena's vandalism over Kunal Kamra's show | Lower representation in Parliament will weaken states' political strength: Stalin at delimitation meeting | Lower representation in Parliament will weaken states' political strength: Stalin at delimitation meeting | MK Stalin hosts mega multi-state meeting on delimitation in Chennai, BJP calls it drama | Cash pile accused Justice Yashwant Varma was named in CBI's FIR for alleged corruption, SC junked it later | London: Heathrow Airport resumes operation after substation fire causes power disruption | Bangladesh interim government not planning to ban Sheikh Hasina's Awami League | Fire at Delhi HC judge's house leads to recovery of unaccounted cash, SC collegium acts
Supreme Court | Farooq Abdullah

'Views different from govt not sedition': SC dismisses PIL against Farooq Abdullah

| @indiablooms | Mar 03, 2021, at 11:35 pm

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking  action against former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Farooq Abdullah for making statements against the scrapping of Article 370.

The bench headed by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul observed that the expression of views that are different from the opinion of the government cannot be termed seditious.

The PIL filed by petitioners Rajat Sharma and Neh Srivastava was against the National Conference leader's remarks on the abrogation of Article 370 in 2019. It also alleged that the Abdullah sought help from Pakistan and China against India on the matter.

While dismissing the plea, the Apex Court also slapped a fine of Rs 50,000 on the petitioners for failing to substantiate the allegations made in the litigation.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.