September 23, 2026 05:29 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
ECI breaks silence on SIR row: Poll body says all decisions were ‘unanimous’ despite differences | Gyanesh Kumar under fire: Opposition seeks CEC’s removal as SIR row explodes over report of 14 internal ECI objections | SIR row explodes: Report claims 14 objections by 2 Election Commissioners; Opposition demands CEC Gyanesh Kumar's removal | IIT Bombay professor Suryanarayana Doolla sent on leave amid Sahil Wakode death controversy: Report | Narendra Modi's Canada visit confirmed: Carney eyes trade deal by year-end | 'When we win, we're tearing this down': MAGA activist's threat to 90-foot Hanuman statue in US sparks backlash | Delhi women's safety under spotlight: 17-year-old allegedly gang-raped near Kalkaji Mandir in fourth such incident in 10 days | India gets fresh push for permanent UNSC seat as 4 European nations back bid | IIT Bombay professor gets faculty backing after student death controversy; protests intensify over suspension | IIT Bombay protests erupt after student’s death; authorities meet students over 18 demands

Terrorism should not be politised, says BJP MP Satya Pal Singh

| @indiablooms | Jul 15, 2019, at 05:23 pm

New Delhi, Jul 15 (UNI) BJP Member Satya Pal Singh on Monday emphasised that terrorism should not politicised and the menace affects the entire humanity.

Speaking during the debate on The National Investigation Agency (NIA) Bill, 2019 in the Lok Sabha, the Baghpat lawmaker said earlier terrorism was politicised in the countyry, adding that the previous regime never tackled terrorism as serious crime against humanity.

Citing terrorisn cases of Malegaon case and Hyderabad, he said the terrorism cases were made political as it did not suit the ruling dispensation.

Condemining the erstwhile UPA regime, he said 'In India, we waited for 7 years to get a new law for terrorism while in the United States, a appropriate law was made to intercept and obstruct terrorism immediately.

The US has separate law for terrorism so David Hadley was convicted, he said.

Singh, who was Mumbai Police Commissioner, said assets attaching powers is vested with the state DGP, and suggested that this power should be given to the NIA DGP.

He also suggested that NIA is applicable to Jammu and Kashmir and suggested that 'Ranbir Penal Code' applicable in the northern state, should be included in the Act.

Biju Janata Dal Member Bhartruhari Mahtab suggested that highest state police officer should be informed about the terorism cases being investigated and said why there is mismatch between state police and central forces.

He said if state DGP becomes part of investigation, it becomes useful.

Kalyan Banerjee of Trinamool Congress wondered whether by the new Bill the existing NIA law being diluted.

He also said when India is attacked, not many countries speak about it but when the US suffers terrorist attack, all countries are making a hue and cry.

Banerjee said since there is no treaty with Pakistan then how will the provisions of the new law be applicable to the Western neighbour.

The Bill states that among other things, the NIA officials will have the power to investigate scheduled offences committed outside India subject to international treaties.

Since the object is speedy trial, Banerjee suggested that the time taken for investigation should be fixed and a clause should be added for this, so that there is accountability.

Danish Ali of BSP, Durga Prasad Rao of YSRCP, Rahul Ramesh Shewale of Shiv Sena and Meenakshi Lekhi also spoke.

The debate was initiated earlier by Congress member Manish Tewari. 

Image: UNI

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.