July 28, 2026 01:47 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Bihar cop suspended after viral AK-47 firing video during NEET protest crackdown | After Dharmendra Pradhan's exit, 'E20 Janta Party' emerges, demands Nitin Gadkari's resignation over fuel policy | 'Can't lathicharge people just because they are protesting': Supreme Court slams Delhi Police over NEET protest crackdown | 'Victory of democracy': Sonam Wangchuk congratulates Gen Z as Dharmendra Pradhan resigns after month-long NEET protests | 'Democracy has triumphed': CJP celebrates as Dharmendra Pradhan quits, warns Centre 'Don't mess with cockroaches' | Centre buckles under CJP-led NEET protests; Dharmendra Pradhan quits as Education Minister | Delhi Police flags 2,500 suspected criminals at Jantar Mantar amid NEET protest | 'No assurances, sack Dharmendra Pradhan': CJP fires back at PM Modi over NEET row | 'Don't insult students': Rahul Gandhi tears into PM Modi's midnight NEET video, demands Dharmendra Pradhan's exit | Trump slaps fresh tariffs on India, China and 58 others over forced labour concerns

Supreme Court to give ruling today on use of Aadhar card

| | Oct 07, 2015, at 04:03 pm
New Delhi, Oct 7 (IBNS) The Supreme Court will decide on Wednesday whether the Aadhar card can be used for services like opening bank accounts and taking phone connections.

The unique identity or UID that the government wants to introduce across the country has been  in court over privacy concerns since it uses biometric data like fingerprint..

The apex court has already ruled that Aadhar card can be used voluntarily only for availing subsidies under the public distribution system and purchasing kerosene and cooking gas.

The Centre, Reserve Bank of India, stock market watchdog SEBI, telecom regulator TRAI, and a number of states moved the Supreme Court for extending the voluntary use of Aadhar card to other services.

During hearing on Tuesday, petitioners  opposing Aadhar argued that since there was no law on forsaking privacy of citizens and the debate had been referred to a larger panel, this bench of three judges should not hear it.

Countering this,  Attorney General  Mukul Rohatgi said, "We don't know when the larger bench will be constituted. It may take few months and till such time, should citizens wait? This court opened its doors at 2 am for an individual, can the court shut for crores of people?"

TRAI asserted that since the mandatory use of the Aadhar card had been stopped by the Supreme Court, it was now "easy" for terrorists to get mobile connections.

On conclusion of the hearing, the court  said it will pass orders at 3:30 pm on Wednesday.

 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.