June 02, 2025 07:20 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Operation Sindoor is not yet over, it's just a pause: Rajnath Singh | Army reduced terrorist hideouts to ruins: PM Modi on Operation Sindoor in Bihar | Prosperity came to Jammu and Kashmir after Article 370 abrogation: Salman Khurshid hails Modi govt's historic step | 'Disappointed': Shashi Tharoor on Colombia's condolence message for Pak deaths in Operation Sindoor | Nine tourists go missing after bus falls into swollen Teesta river in Sikkim | US Judge extends order blocking Trump ban on foreign students' enrolment in Harvard | India rejects Team Trump's latest claim on tariffs' role behind ceasefire with Pakistan | Operation Sindoor is not over yet: PM Modi's announcement from Bengal | 'Why aren't you giving sindoor to your wife first?': Mamata slams Modi on Operation Sindoor | Murshidabad and Malda communal violence reflect TMC govt's cruelty: Modi in Bengal

Supreme Court says no to firecracker ban during Diwali

| | Oct 28, 2015, at 07:58 pm
New Delhi, Oct 28 (IBNS) The Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to put a ban on bursting firecrackers during Diwali, saying it might be "dangerous" to infringe upon the common people's right to enjoy their religious festivities.

Refusing the plea made on behalf of three infants, who moved the Supreme Court for relief against the air pollution caused by firecrackers during Diwali, a Bench led by Chief Justice H.L. Dattu said: "the court cannot stop people from bursting crackers in front of their homes."

 "If we try to stop, he will say it is my right. Such a ban will lead to a dangerous situation. Chaos," he said.

The court also dismissed arguments made by senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi to prescribe a time limit and even designate public spaces where people can burst crackers.

"Sorry. We cannot tell everybody to go to some Nehru maidan and burst crackers," the Chief Justice said.

The Bench, however, pulled up the Centre for not publishing advertisements widely in the media warning of health hazards and to follow regulations concerning noise pollution.

The court further reiterated its 2005 order prescribing time limit to avoid causing disturbance to the public during "night time".

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu