July 25, 2026 03:02 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'No assurances, sack Dharmendra Pradhan': CJP fires back at PM Modi over NEET row | 'Don't insult students': Rahul Gandhi tears into PM Modi's midnight NEET video, demands Dharmendra Pradhan's exit | Trump slaps fresh tariffs on India, China and 58 others over forced labour concerns | Sonam Wangchuk ends 26-day hunger strike after 'long negotiations', urges CJP protesters to maintain peace | PM Modi promises fresh steps on paper leaks in late night video | NEET protest: Centre invites CJP for talks; protesters stick to Jantar Mantar or neutral venue demand | Khalistani terrorist Pannun announces $1 million support for CJP protests, calls for 'balkanisation of India' | 'We'll put drugs in your bag': Mumbai cop suspended after viral threat to NEET protesters | 'Fulfill the demands first': CJP hits back at PM Modi's message for youth | Delhi cop seen slapping woman protester removed from Jantar Mantar after viral outrage

Sedition or defamation charges can not be invoked for criticism of Government : SC

| | Sep 06, 2016, at 06:53 pm
New Delhi, Sept 6 (IBNS) : In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court has stated that sedition or defamation cases cannot be slapped on anyone criticising the Government, reports said.

“Someone making a statement to criticise the government does not invoke an offence under sedition or defamation law,"  a bench of Justices Dipak Misra and U.U. Lalit said on Monday.

"We have made it clear that invoking of section 124(A) of IPC (sedition) requires certain guidelines to be followed as per the earlier judgement of the apex court,” the bench said.

The top court's observation came as advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for an NGO, said sedition was a serious offence and the law pertaining to it was being grossly misused.

We don’t have to explain the sedition law. It’s already there in the five-judge constitution bench judgment in Kedar Nath Singh vs state of Bihar of 1962," it said.

The court, however, disposed of a petition filed by NGO Common Cause alleging misuse of the sedition law and  refused to pass a direction, saying  a copy of this order be sent to all Chief Secretaries of states and the Directors General of Police.

The NGO had said that there has been an increase in the number of cases of sedition against intellectuals, activists, students and cited the instance of sedition charge being levelled against Amnesty India for organising a debate on Kashmir.

 

 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.