February 28, 2026 01:56 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Panic in Kolkata! Powerful earthquake sends people fleeing buildings | Kejriwal and Sisodia acquitted in liquor policy case; AAP chief calls arrest 'Modi-Shah's conspiracy' | Pakistan bombs Kabul after Afghan forces strike border — tensions on the brink of war! | India crush Zimbabwe by 72 runs to stay alive in T20 World Cup semifinal race | 'CBFC didn't apply mind': Kerala High Court stays Kerala Story 2 release | Operation Sindoor 2.0 will be stronger if India forced to launch: Top Army commander warns Pakistan | ‘Heads must roll!’ Supreme Court cracks down on NCERT textbook over judiciary chapter | ‘1.2 crore voters may be dropped’: Mamata Banerjee flags major concern over SIR list | India-US trade deal at risk? Trump imposes massive 126% duty on solar imports | ‘My life reflects this reality’: Shooter Tara Shahdeo recalls forced conversion amid Kerala Story 2 row

SC to hear Jayalalithaa's case on Friday

| | Oct 13, 2014, at 04:40 pm
New Delhi, Oct 13 (IBNS): The Supreme Court decided to hear former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa's request for bail on Friday.

The AIADMK chief had asked for her sentence to be suspended citing health reason for bail. As a result of which, she will spend this working week in jail in Bangalore.

The 66-year-old politician was arrested in September this year being given a four-year sentence for corruption while in office during her first term as CM from 1991 to 1996.

Jayalalithaa, three others including her long-time associate Sashikala, were convicted in the 18 year-old corruption case by a special court in Bangalore. The case was filed in 1996 by Subramanian Swamy, now a BJP leader.

It was argued in the court that she had amassed property worth Rs. 66.65 crores - including 30 kg of gold, 12,000 saris and 2000 acres of land- despite not taking any salary as chief minister.

In reply, Jayalalithaa has said that she acquired her property and other assets through legal means, which was quashed by the special court.

The case against her was transferred in 2001 from Tamil Nadu to neighbouring Karnataka on the orders the Supreme Court.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.