July 08, 2025 07:32 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
PM Modi meets Uruguay President on sidelines of 17th BRICS Summit in Rio de Janeiro | PM Modi meets Bolivian President on the sidelines of BRICS in Rio de Janeiro | Supreme Court refuses interim stay on Election Commission's voter list revision drive in Bihar, hearing on Thursday | Khalistani terrorist Harpreet Singh alias Happy Passia, responsible for terror attacks in Punjab, brought to India from US: Report | Calcutta HC dismisses medical council's order suspending TMC leader Dr. Santanu Sen | I do not have any cabinet: Kangana Ranaut on Mandi disaster relief; Congress slams BJP MP for 'insensitivity' | 'Fadnavis did what Balasaheb Thackeray could not...': Raj Thackeray jibes at Maharashtra CM after MNS chief reunites with Uddhav | Modi will bow to Trump's deadline: Rahul Gandhi attacks PM over India-US trade deal | Marathi should be respected but thuggery in the name of language won't be tolerated: Devendra Fadnavis reacts to slapgate | Pune rape: Accused was not delivery boy but complainant's friend, she was angry at him for forced sex, say police
Adani
Image Credit: wikipedia.org

SC to give ruling on formation of committee in Adani-Hindenburg case today

| @indiablooms | Mar 02, 2023, at 11:24 am

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court will announce its verdict on Thursday regarding the appointment of a committee to investigate the Adani-Hindenburg controversy.

A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court, headed by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dr Dhananjaya Yeshwant Chadrachud, and also comprising Justices P S Narasimha and J B Pardiwa, had reserved its verdict on the constitution of the panel.

The Supreme Court had in its order on February 17, said that it would not accept the sealed cover names of experts suggested by the Union government for inclusion in the committee to be set up to examine US short-seller Hindenburg's report on the Adani report that led to meltdown of the Indian conglomerate's shares, noting that "We want to maintain full transparency" in the case.

"We will select the experts and maintain full transparency. If we take names from the government, it would amount to a government constituted committee. There has to be full (public) confidence in the committee," the bench had said.

The Supreme Court also observed that it wanted to maintain full transparency, it may result in people thhinking it is a government-appointed panel.

"If we accept suggestions we should disclose it to the other side so that there is transparency. So we will appoint the committee and appoint members on our own," the Supreme Court had said.

The top court also refused to accept SEBIs suggestions for the appointment of an expert committee to examine changes required in the regulatory framework, and said that it will appoint the same itself to maintain “fullest transparency for protection of investors.”

"We do not want to put out names since it may affect them. We don't want names and we will do our own work but we can," the Supreme Court had said, in its order.

Advocate Vishal Tiwari, one of the petitioners, said that we want this entire thing to be probed and a high-powered committee to look into it, what is happening in corporate bodies.

"Fair, unbiased and credible investigation is required in this case," lawyer for one of the petitioners, had told the Supreme Court.

Advocate Prashant Bhushan, for another petitioner, said: "We demand a SIT probe into the adani group case and also a probe into the role of banks."

"Hindenburg Research report shows that many offshore companies were owned by brother of the promoter of adani group.. percentage of shares held in Adani group exceeded the max laid down as 75% by SEBI and offshore funds were being manipulated to increase share price," Bhushan had told the Supreme Court.

Bhushan said that we seek to know the source of funds by the shell companies which the report shows.

The Supreme Court heard a number of petitions filed by lawyer duo -- Manohar Lal Sharma and Vishal Tiwari -- and Congress leader and Member of Parliament (MP) Dr Jaya Thakur, seeking a direction for investigation against Adani Group in the light of the Hindenburg report.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.