June 22, 2026 01:37 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Italy and I never beg': Meloni fires back at Trump over G7 photo claim | No more 'brother': Stalin's formal birthday greeting to Rahul reflects deepening rift | TMC seeks disqualification of 20 rebel MPs, Abhishek says 'membership should go' | Nara Lokesh pitches Andhra Pradesh as investment hub during Kolkata visit, sets $2.4 trillion economy goal | 'Least restrictive option': Setback for Telegram as Delhi HC backs Centre's ban ahead of NEET-UG re-test | Fortuner torched, BJP leaders burnt alive: Sand mining feud ends in triple murder in Chhattisgarh | 'If Modi is the leader and India is attacked, we'll be there': Trump's strong assurance at G7 | 'Safety of Indian seafarers of utmost importance': PM Modi's strong message to Trump at G7 | Trump says Iran deal 'not final', threatens fresh strikes if Tehran ‘doesn’t behave’ | G7 declares war on global drug cartels, unveils major anti-trafficking plan
Photo courtesy : wikipedia.org

SC puts partial hold on Waqf law: No new appointments, status quo till May 5

| @indiablooms | Apr 17, 2025, at 04:49 pm

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday paused the implementation of select provisions of the amended Waqf law, including the mandate to induct non-Muslims into Waqf boards and councils, until the matter is taken up again on May 5, media reports said.

The bench, headed by the Chief Justice, also directed that the ‘waqf by user’ clause must not be denotified during this period, reported India Today.

The Centre told the court it would refrain from making any appointments to the boards under the new law, which alters the board’s composition to make non-Muslim representation mandatory.

"SG (Tushar) Mehta assured that till the next date, no appointment shall take place to board and councils under the 2025 Act. He also assures that the status of waqfs, including waqf by user, already declared by notification or gazetted, shall not be changed," the court recorded in its order, according to the report.

Appearing at the outset, SG Mehta termed any stay—direct or indirect—on the Waqf law as an extreme step that should not be taken merely on the basis of a surface reading.

"We received lakhs and lakhs of representations before the amendments were made. Villages were taken as waqfs. Private properties were taken as waqfs... Your lordships are taking a serious and harsh step by staying directly or indirectly statutory provisions," he submitted, the report said.

The court clarified that it was not staying the law in its entirety.

"We have said there were some positive things in the law. We have stated that there cannot be a complete stay. But, we also don't want the situation to change which is prevailing now... like the 5 years following Islam one, we are not staying that," the bench observed.

This referred to another controversial clause in the legislation, which bars Muslims from creating waqf properties unless they have completed five years of practising Islam.

A day earlier, the apex court had hinted at staying certain sections of the law, citing concerns over the far-reaching consequences of some of its provisions.

However, it had refrained from issuing an order at the Centre’s request.

The Waqf law has triggered widespread protests.

In West Bengal, violent clashes occurred last week.

Murshidabad district alone witnessed three killings, and several were injured amid the unrest.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.