July 28, 2025 08:45 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'I feel sad to support such a govt': Chirag Paswan slams Bihar administration after woman 'gang-raped' in Bodh Gaya | Bihar woman gang-raped in moving ambulance after she fell unconscious during Home Guard Test | Operation Sindoor still on, preparedness level should be high: CDS Anil Chauhan | PM Modi tops list of global leaders with 75 percent approval rating, Donald Trump languishes at 8th place | President Murmu, PM Modi pay tributes to martyrs' on Kargil Vijay Diwas | Jagdeep Dhankar's resignation: Election Commission initiates steps for Vice President elections | Centre bans Ullu, ALTT, other OTT apps over obscene content | Centre bans Ullu, ALTT, other OTT apps over obscene content | Deeply touched by Muizzu's gesture, writes Narendra Modi on X after arriving in Male | Tejashwi Yadav mulls boycotting Bihar polls over SIR, says 'no point in holding elections when people can't vote'
Photo courtesy : wikipedia.org

SC puts partial hold on Waqf law: No new appointments, status quo till May 5

| @indiablooms | Apr 17, 2025, at 04:49 pm

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday paused the implementation of select provisions of the amended Waqf law, including the mandate to induct non-Muslims into Waqf boards and councils, until the matter is taken up again on May 5, media reports said.

The bench, headed by the Chief Justice, also directed that the ‘waqf by user’ clause must not be denotified during this period, reported India Today.

The Centre told the court it would refrain from making any appointments to the boards under the new law, which alters the board’s composition to make non-Muslim representation mandatory.

"SG (Tushar) Mehta assured that till the next date, no appointment shall take place to board and councils under the 2025 Act. He also assures that the status of waqfs, including waqf by user, already declared by notification or gazetted, shall not be changed," the court recorded in its order, according to the report.

Appearing at the outset, SG Mehta termed any stay—direct or indirect—on the Waqf law as an extreme step that should not be taken merely on the basis of a surface reading.

"We received lakhs and lakhs of representations before the amendments were made. Villages were taken as waqfs. Private properties were taken as waqfs... Your lordships are taking a serious and harsh step by staying directly or indirectly statutory provisions," he submitted, the report said.

The court clarified that it was not staying the law in its entirety.

"We have said there were some positive things in the law. We have stated that there cannot be a complete stay. But, we also don't want the situation to change which is prevailing now... like the 5 years following Islam one, we are not staying that," the bench observed.

This referred to another controversial clause in the legislation, which bars Muslims from creating waqf properties unless they have completed five years of practising Islam.

A day earlier, the apex court had hinted at staying certain sections of the law, citing concerns over the far-reaching consequences of some of its provisions.

However, it had refrained from issuing an order at the Centre’s request.

The Waqf law has triggered widespread protests.

In West Bengal, violent clashes occurred last week.

Murshidabad district alone witnessed three killings, and several were injured amid the unrest.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu