March 12, 2026 02:28 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Supreme Court allows first-ever passive euthanasia for 32-year-old man in coma for 13 years | As Iran-US war disrupts global gas supply, India issues guidelines to manage shortages | LPG crisis hits metros: Commercial cylinder shortage triggers panic as govt prioritises domestic supply | Iran war disrupts LPG supplies, restaurants in major Indian cities edge towards shutdown | ‘How dare you question judicial officers?’: SC raps Bengal SIR pleas, orders appellate tribunals for voter list appeals | 'Book withdrawn': NCERT apologises for controversial judiciary chapter after Supreme Court ban | Indian stock market surges as Brent crude dips below $100 after Trump’s Iran remarks | Australia grants asylum to five Iranian women footballers after anthem protest; Albanese says ‘they are safe here’ | Trump administration labels Afghanistan ‘state sponsor of wrongful detention’ | Trump threatens Iran with ‘20 times harder’ strike if oil flow through Strait of Hormuz is disrupted
PNB Scam

PNB scam: Nirav Modi denied permission to appeal against extradition to India in UK Supreme Court

| @indiablooms | Dec 16, 2022, at 04:00 am

London: The London High Court on Thursday denied fugitive businessman Nirav Modi permission to appeal against his extradition to India in the UK Supreme Court.

The Royal Courts of Justice in London, Lord Justice Jeremy Stuart-Smith and Justice Robert Jay ruled that “the Appellant's (Nirav Modi) application for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court is refused", a report in the media said.

The 51-year-old diamond magnate escaped India in 2018 before his name emerged in the Rs 11,000-crore Punjab National Bank fraud.

The latest High Court order also directs Modi to pay the legal costs related to the latest application, assessed in the sum of GBP 150,247.00, the report said.

Nirav Modi is lodged in Wandsworth prison in London.

Earlier, the Royal Courts of Justice had noted that his extradition wouldn't be "unjust or oppressive" when his lawyers contended that he was suffering from depression and was at suicide risk, and extradition to India could worsen his condition owing to the hostile environment in the country where politicians demonised him.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.