September 27, 2026 11:54 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Asif bhai gun nikal': 17-year-old's chilling account of men posing as cops raping her in South Delhi park | Indian passport rules changed: New validity, fees for children and adults explained | 'Terrorism by Pakistan will have consequences': India issues blunt warning at UNGA | Trouble for Gyanesh Kumar? Plea filed in Supreme Court seeking prosecution of CEC | Air India pilot suspended after failing alcohol test before Zurich-Delhi flight, weeks after marijuana case | 'Don't be selective, boycott all elections': CJP's Abhijeet Dipke's blunt message to Opposition | 'Resign by tomorrow or face nationwide protest from October 2': CJP's Abhijeet Dipke's fresh warning to Gyanesh Kumar | 'Locked' iPhone 17 at centre of mystery surrounding IIT Bombay student's death | 'Rahul Gandhi is devoid of wisdom and knowledge': BJP hits back over 'vote theft' claim | ‘How does anti-incumbency disappear?’: Rahul Gandhi targets Modi, Shah in fresh ‘vote chori’ attack, demands Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation

PM Modi slams Sam Pitroda's comment on airstrike, says 'opposition insults forces'

| @indiablooms | Mar 22, 2019, at 12:31 pm

New Delhi, Mar 22 (IBNS): Prime Minister Narendra Modi tore apart Congress leader Sam Pitroda, who said it is unfair to blame Pakistan for the Pulwama terror attack, stating the Opposition insults forces time and again.

The Prime Minister tweeted, "Opposition insults our forces time and again. I appeal to my fellow Indians- question Opposition leaders on their statements. Tell them- 130 crore Indians will not forgive or forget the Opposition for their antics. India stands firmly with our forces."

What prompted Modi to attack Opposition?

Modi responded after Pitroda, a close aid of Congress chief Rahul Gandhi, said it would be unfair to blame an entire nation for the activities of few people with a reference to the recent Pulwama terror attack that had left at least 40 Indian paramilitary personnel martyred.

Pitroda also asked for more proofs of the airstrike conducted by the Indian Air Force (IAF) as a response to the Pulwama attack.

Modi had hit out at the Congress leader saying, "Loyal courtier of Congress’ royal dynasty admits what the nation already knew- Congress was unwilling to respond to forces of terror. This is a New India- we will answer terrorists in a language they understand and with interest!"

Not just Pitroda but Samajwadi Party (SP) leader Ram Gopal Yadav also courted a controversy by accusing the government of letting the paramilitary personnel martyred to gain votes in the upcoming Lok Sabha polls.

Not sparing the SP leader too, Modi, who will spearhead ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)'s poll campaign, tweeted, "Opposition is the natural habitat of terror apologists and questioners of our armed forces. This reprehensible statement by a senior leader like Ram Gopal Ji insults all those who have given their lives in protecting Kashmir. It humiliates the families of our martyrs."

Where the airstrike was conducted?

The airstrike was conducted across the Line of Control (LoC) in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK).

How many terrorists were killed in the airstrike?

Though BJP chief Amit Shah had claimed over 250 terrorists were killed due to the airstrike, the IAF said it is not possible for them to count the number of militants killed.

BJP leader links airstrike with elections:

A row had erupted after former Karnataka Chief Minister and BJP leader, BS Yeddyurapa, said the airstrike would help his party to win 22 out of 28 Lok Sabha seats in the southern state, which is presently ruled by the Congress-Janata Dal Secular alliance.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.