September 03, 2026 09:30 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Supreme Court slams Bar Council of India over NALSAR row: ‘No power to take action against law students’ | ‘Technical error, not U-turn’: Kerala CM Satheesan denies deleting video slamming cleric’s women remarks after Islamic Scholars’ meet | Bombay HC orders CBI probe into Sushant Singh Rajput's ex-manager Disha Salian's death case | Vijay for PM in 2029? TVK says Rahul Gandhi will ‘hold his hand’ to make him Prime Minister | CJP calls off Sept 5 Delhi march after Supreme Court quashes FIRs against protesters | ‘Dismantle entire terror ecosystem’: Modi’s strong message at SCO Summit in Shehbaz’s presence | Modi’s big appeal after 7.8% GDP growth: ‘Don’t travel abroad, avoid destination weddings’ | Modi-Pezeshkian talks: Iran seeks India’s 'extensive contacts' to end West Asia war | Indus Waters Treaty row: India rejects Hague court order, says ‘no jurisdiction’ over its sovereign decisions | India beats the odds with 7.8% GDP growth; PM Modi has a message for critics
Personal Liberty
Representational photo of rwo adults share a quiet moment at home, reflecting companionship and personal choice. Photo: ChatGPT

'Married man's consensual live-in relationship with an adult woman not a crime': Allahabad High Court

| @indiablooms | Mar 27, 2026, at 03:43 pm

Allahabad/IBNS: In a significant observation, the Allahabad High Court on Friday said it is not a crime for a married man to be in a consensual live-in relationship with an adult woman, according to media reports.

The court made the remark while hearing a writ petition filed by a live-in couple seeking to quash a police case lodged against them.

The petition was filed by Anamika and Netrapal after the woman’s mother, Kanti, registered a complaint at Jaitipur Police Station on January 8. She had alleged that Netrapal “enticed” her 18-year-old daughter to leave home with him, with assistance from another individual.

Challenging the case, the couple told the court they were consenting adults in a live-in relationship.

The court observed that no criminal offence is made out in such a situation and that Netrapal cannot be prosecuted merely for cohabiting with another woman despite being married.

The court directed the police not to arrest the couple and restrained the woman’s family members from causing them any harm. It also barred the family from visiting the couple’s residence or contacting them directly or indirectly.

Further, the court instructed the local Superintendent of Police to ensure the couple’s “safety and security.”

Taking note of the couple’s apprehension of “honour killing” and alleged death threats from family members, the court pulled up the police for inaction, stressing that it is their duty to protect the couple.

Emphasising that law must remain distinct from morality, the court underscored that individual rights cannot be dictated by social opinions.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.