January 26, 2026 11:39 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘Dear Indian Friends’: Macron’s Republic Day message to India melts hearts | ‘Dhurandhar’ actor Nadeem Khan arrested in rape case; housemaid alleges abuse on marriage promise | Non-Hindus may no longer be allowed in Badrinath and Kedarnath — temple committee confirms | ‘No less than a concert’: PM Modi lauds India’s new bhajan club culture among Gen Z | Constitution ‘sacrosanct’ to PM Modi: Shashi Tharoor’s statement sets political chatter ablaze | A little piece of Greenland': Elon Musk takes a dig at Trump's Board of Peace at Davos | Over 5,000 killed during massive crackdown launched on Iranian protesters: Human rights body | 'Insult' in Kochi, silence in Delhi: Shashi Tharoor likely to skip key Congress meeting as party tensions surface | Outrage in America: ICE detains 5-year-old after he comes home from preschool | Top Maoist leader with ₹2 crore bounty among 16 eliminated in major Jharkhand encounter
Amit Shah (L) & Rahul Gandhi (R) in Lok Sabha. Photo: X/Videograb.

Lok Sabha turns battleground as Amit Shah, Rahul Gandhi trade blows over 'vote chori' claims

| @indiablooms | Dec 10, 2025, at 09:13 pm

Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi clashed sharply in the Lok Sabha during a heated debate on electoral reforms, making for one of the most confrontational exchanges of the season.

The flashpoint came when Rahul Gandhi challenged Shah to hold an open debate on the allegations he had raised in recent press conferences about irregularities in voter lists.

Shah, visibly irritated, pushed back, declaring that no one would dictate the order or content of his speech in Parliament.

During his address, Shah accused the Opposition of repeatedly attacking the integrity of existing electoral rolls, while simultaneously objecting to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR)—a process, he said, meant to update and clean up voter lists.

He mocked the Congress for what he described as selective outrage.

“When you win, the voter list is perfect—you celebrate and take oath. But the moment you suffer a loss, like in Bihar, suddenly the voter list becomes flawed. These double standards won’t work,” he said.

Shah also derided Rahul Gandhi’s series of press conferences on “vote chori,” including the one he termed a “hydrogen bomb.”

He accused the Nehru-Gandhi family of being “generational vote thieves,” sparking loud protests from the Opposition benches.

Rahul Gandhi interrupted, demanding that Shah first explain why Election Commissioners had been given immunity for actions taken while in office. He then challenged the minister to debate the contents of his press conferences one by one.

A visibly agitated Shah responded, saying, "I have been elected for three decades. Parliament will not run on your terms. I will speak in the order I choose. Listen patiently—I will answer everything.”

Gandhi later dismissed Shah’s tone as “defensive and fearful.”

Shah used the moment to launch a pointed historical attack. He claimed the “first instance of vote theft” occurred when Jawaharlal Nehru became Prime Minister despite Sardar Patel receiving more state unit votes.

He then cited the Allahabad High Court verdict that invalidated Indira Gandhi’s Raebareli win, calling it a “big vote chori,” and accused her of changing laws and superseding senior judges to shield herself.

Turning to Sonia Gandhi, Shah referred to an old allegation that she voted before gaining citizenship—prompting immediate objections from Congress MPs, who called it baseless.

Moving back to current issues, Shah defended EVMs and the SIR process, accusing the Opposition of wanting to retain illegal immigrants on voter rolls. This remark triggered a coordinated Opposition walkout.

Outside Parliament, Rahul Gandhi said the Home Minister had evaded every substantive question.

“He avoided discussing transparent voter rolls, clarity on EVM architecture, or the evidence I presented. His reply was completely defensive.”

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.