April 05, 2026 03:46 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘Not denied a ticket’: Annamalai explains absence from BJP’s Tamil Nadu candidate list | ‘Ghar-wapsi soon’: PoK wants to return to India, claims Imam organisation chief | Kerala polls shocker: Tharoor’s convoy stopped, security guard attacked mid-campaign | AAP drops Raghav Chadha from key parliamentary role, sparks buzz over internal rift | Amit Shah to camp in West Bengal for 15 days during Assembly polls; predicts Mamata’s defeat in state and Bhabanipur | 'BJP plotting President’s Rule, don’t fall in the trap': Mamata Banerjee on Malda unrest, urges peace | 'Most polarised state': CJI Kant raps Bengal govt over 9-hour hostage of judicial officers | Bengal SIR protest: Judge pleads for help amid mob attack after 9-hour hostage ordeal | Bengal SIR progress: 47 lakh of 60 lakh adjudicated cases disposed of, Supreme Court informed | Amit Shah to join Suvendu Adhikari on Bhabanipur nomination day; BJP plans mega roadshow

Kerala: IAS officer facing action for supporting Modi gets court relief

| | Jan 19, 2016, at 08:47 pm
New Delhi, Jan 19 (IBNS) The Supreme Court has put on hold the disciplinary proceedings initiated by the Kerala government against a bureaucrat who had praised Prime Minister Narendra Modi in a newspaper article in 2013.

The apex  court also issued notice to Kerala's Congress-led UDF government, asking it to respond to Dr B Ashok's petition challenging the action taken against him.

The Indian Administrative Service officer had written a newspaper article asking why  Modi, who was the Chief Minister of Gujarat at the time, should not be allowed to visit Thiruvananthapuram's Sivagiri Mutt during an ongoing controversy on the subject.  

The mutt had invited  Modi for a visit during a function, which the Left-led LDF had opposed observing that  since he had been unable stop the 2002 riots, he should not be allowed into the temple.

In his article, Dr Ashok argued that the riots should not be considered a reason for such a course of action.

"It is true that the Gujarat Government might not have been effective in preventing the killings (in 2002) but such genocidal riots had followed the assassination of Indira Gandhi," he wrote. In the article, he also criticised Congress vice-president Rahul Gandhi for not accepting the invitation to speak at a function at the mutt.

The Congress-led UDF government initiated disciplinary proceedings against Dr Ashok, who at the time, was the Vice-Chancellor of the Kerala Veterinary University.

In 2011, the state government had decided to sack Dr Ashok as vice-chancellor for alleged violation of service rules, but the Kerala High Court had reinstated him.

But in 2013, the High Court refused to stop the government action against him.

The officer then appealed to the top Court, saying as the vice chancellor of the university, he did not violate any service rules.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.