June 06, 2026 01:01 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
After Annamalai exit, BJP gives up Andhra Rajya Sabha seat in NDA rejig | K. Annamalai quits BJP, triggers speculations over his new party | RBI hits pause button again! Repo rate remains unchanged at 5.25% amid global turmoil | 'Was it directed by ruling ecosystem?': Congress questions LIC stake in Rajesh Exports under SEBI scanner | Boost for Congress! Vijay allots Tamil Nadu's lone Rajya Sabha seat to key ally | Fresh trouble for Mamata: Complaint filed over explosive Amit Shah claim in Osman Hadi case | 'Communication gap': Rajesh Exports rejects SEBI allegations, says revenues were not overstated | ₹15.2 lakh crore revenue questioned! SEBI action sends Rajesh Exports shares tumbling | 'If not now, when!': Sonam Wangchuk backs Cockroach Janta Party protest; spokespersons named ahead of founder Abhijeet Dipke's India return | Cabinet approves Rs. 10,000 crore support package to stabilise ATF prices for airlines
Gauri Lankesh
IBNS File Photo

Karnataka HC grants bail to accused in Gauri Lankesh case

| @indiablooms | Dec 09, 2023, at 04:49 am

Bengaluru/IBNS/UNI: The Karnataka High Court recently granted bail to Mohan Nayak, one of the accused in the activist-journalist Gauri Lankesh's murder case, due to lack of evidence

With this, Nayak became the first person to get bail in the case. Gauri was shot dead in 2017.

Justice S Viashwajith Shetty gave Nayak bail on grounds that none of the 23 witnesses established proof that he was part of the meeting where the accused persons allegedly conspired to murder Gauri.

Most of those witnesses have only spoken about Nayak taking a house on rent at Kumbalagodu on the outskirts of Bengaluru, he said.

According to the prosecution, he had taken the house on rent to give shelter to actual assailants in the case.

The court opined that provisions under section 19 of the Karnataka Control of Organized Crimes Act (COCA) may not apply to the confessions as the same was done before the sanction was granted.

"Even otherwise, the requirements of Section 19 have not been complied with in the present case. The confessions have not been recorded by an officer of the rank of Superintendent of Police in the manner as provided under Section 19 of the COCA,” the court said.

The court said that even if charges under COCA are proved against the accused, the offenses are not punishable exclusively with death or life imprisonment. The minimum punishment for the offenses is imprisonment of five years.

The record revealed that Nayak has been in custody for over five years. Against this backdrop, the court opined that even though the COCA has certain conditions for enlarging the accused on bail, the same cannot fetter its judicial power to grant relief when there is undue delay.

The court concluded that the trial may not be completed soon and the delay was not attributable to the accused.

“Under the circumstances, I am of the view that the prayer made by the petitioner in this petition needs to be answered affirmatively,” the bench said while granting Nayak bail.

The High Court had earlier twice denied regular bail to the accused.

Seeking bail on the ground of delay in the conclusion of the trial, the accused said there are a total of 527 chargesheet witnesses in the case and only 90 have been examined to date.

Advocate Amar Correa represented the accused. Special Public Prosecutor Ashok A Naik represented the prosecution.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.