October 04, 2026 12:38 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Asian Games 2026: India beat Pakistan to clinch gold in men's cricket | flydubai cockpit attack: Deleted posts expose Omani co-pilot’s views on women, alleged extremist past | flydubai cockpit horror: Omani co-pilot Hamam al-Hammami attacked Captain Smit Machchhar with crash axe, tried to seize control | flydubai temporarily suspends all Israel flights after co-pilot’s alleged cockpit attack, crash attempt | Grounded in Oman over ‘radical views’, then hired by flydubai: What we know about Omani pilot Hamam al-Hammami | ‘Hanuman Chalisa gave me courage’: Smit Machchhar recounts flydubai cockpit battle to PM Modi | PM Modi speaks to Flydubai pilot Smit Machchhar who foiled crash plot, praises his courage | Putin praises Modi’s ‘good ideas’ to end Ukraine war, thanks Indian PM for peace efforts | Flydubai cockpit attack: Injured Indian pilot Smit Machchhar airlifted to Abu Dhabi | India backs brave flydubai pilot Smit Machchhar, Ambassador meets family after cockpit attack
Pakistani Defence Minister Khawaja Asif. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

'India was only united under Aurangzeb': Pak Minister Khawaja Asif sparks row with provocative remark

| @indiablooms | Oct 08, 2025, at 11:52 pm

Pakistan’s Defence Minister Khawaja Asif has stirred controversy with a new statement claiming that India “was never truly united” except during the rule of Mughal emperor Aurangzeb.

In an interview with Pakistan’s Samaa TV, Asif also said that “chances of war with India are real,” remarks that come amid renewed tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbours.

“As history shows, India was never one united nation, except briefly under Aurangzeb. Pakistan was created in the name of Allah. At home, we argue and compete, but in a fight with India, we come together,” Asif said during the interview.

Historians, however, note that India’s political unity predates the Mughal period by centuries. The Maurya Empire (322–185 BCE), under Emperor Ashoka, unified most of the Indian subcontinent into one state.

Later rulers such as Samudragupta of the Gupta dynasty and Harshavardhana also brought large regions under central rule.

Even within the Mughal era, Emperor Akbar’s reign is widely regarded as a period of consolidation and stability—unlike Aurangzeb’s rule, which was marked by internal rebellions and constant warfare.

Asif’s comments came days after India’s Army Chief General Upendra Dwivedi issued a stern warning to Islamabad to stop supporting terrorism or “risk losing its geographical presence.”

“India is fully prepared this time. We will not show the restraint we exhibited during Operation Sindoor 1.0,” Gen. Dwivedi said.

“This time, the action will be such that Pakistan will have to think whether it wants to exist geographically.”

Asif, however, maintained that Pakistan would respond if provoked. “I do not want escalation, but the risks are real, and I am not denying that. If it comes to war, God willing, we will achieve a better result than before,” he said.

This is not the first time the Pakistani minister has drawn ridicule for controversial remarks. Last year, Asif suggested that flood-affected Pakistanis should “store floodwater in containers” instead of letting it drain away, calling floods a “blessing.”

He also made unsubstantiated claims on international television about shooting down Indian fighter jets—claims he later failed to back with evidence.

The renewed war rhetoric adds to a series of verbal exchanges between India and Pakistan, even as New Delhi maintains its stance that dialogue cannot proceed until Islamabad ends its support for cross-border terrorism.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.