June 30, 2026 11:40 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Ram Temple donation scam: Former trust chief Champat Rai grilled by SIT for 2 hours, says report | Brazil escape Japan scare, Germany crash out as Paraguay script World Cup shocker | India overtakes Taiwan, South Korea to become world's fifth-largest equity market again | Pakistan strikes terror hideouts near Afghan border after Karachi bloodshed, 29 killed | Israel strikes back: Top October 7 militant “eliminated” in precision operation | Radharaman Das, who defended Bengal's vegetarian mid-day meal plan, loses ISKCON post | Fresh paper leak rocks India: Maharashtra TET postponed a day before exam, over 4 lakh aspirants affected | Pune fort murder case: Siya Goyal's brother says family would have called off marriage if she had objected | Donald Trump gets a road named after him in India, says 'Thank You!' | Fresh setback for Gautam Adani? US judge asks DoJ to justify dropping criminal charges
India said it does not recognise the legitimacy of the tribunal for Indus Waters Treaty. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

India rejects Indus Waters Arbitration ruling, calls tribunal 'illegally constituted'

| @indiablooms | May 17, 2026, at 11:58 am

India on Saturday strongly rejected a fresh ruling issued by what it called an “illegally constituted” Court of Arbitration (CoA) under the Indus Waters Treaty, declaring the decision “null and void”.

Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said India does not recognise the legitimacy of the tribunal and has “firmly rejected all prior pronouncements” made by it.

He reiterated that any proceedings or awards issued by the body hold no legal validity.

India reaffirms suspension of Indus Waters Treaty obligations

The dispute stems from the Indus Waters Treaty of 1960 between India and Pakistan, which governs the sharing of river waters from the Indus basin.

India maintained that it has placed the treaty in abeyance, following last year’s Pahalgam terror attack, until Pakistan ends support for cross-border terrorism.

Officials said that once the treaty is in abeyance, India is not bound to comply with its obligations or accept jurisdiction of any external arbitration mechanism linked to it.

Long-running dispute over hydropower projects intensifies

India has repeatedly objected to arbitration proceedings related to hydroelectric projects such as Kishenganga and Ratle in Jammu and Kashmir, arguing that the so-called tribunal has no legal standing.

New Delhi has also accused Pakistan of misusing international forums through “fabricated arbitration mechanisms,” calling the proceedings politically motivated and legally unsustainable.

The latest rejection marks another escalation in the long-running water-sharing dispute between the two neighbours.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.