September 23, 2026 07:13 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
ECI breaks silence on SIR row: Poll body says all decisions were ‘unanimous’ despite differences | Gyanesh Kumar under fire: Opposition seeks CEC’s removal as SIR row explodes over report of 14 internal ECI objections | SIR row explodes: Report claims 14 objections by 2 Election Commissioners; Opposition demands CEC Gyanesh Kumar's removal | IIT Bombay professor Suryanarayana Doolla sent on leave amid Sahil Wakode death controversy: Report | Narendra Modi's Canada visit confirmed: Carney eyes trade deal by year-end | 'When we win, we're tearing this down': MAGA activist's threat to 90-foot Hanuman statue in US sparks backlash | Delhi women's safety under spotlight: 17-year-old allegedly gang-raped near Kalkaji Mandir in fourth such incident in 10 days | India gets fresh push for permanent UNSC seat as 4 European nations back bid | IIT Bombay professor gets faculty backing after student death controversy; protests intensify over suspension | IIT Bombay protests erupt after student’s death; authorities meet students over 18 demands
UNI

Flashpoint Ayodhya: Supreme Court may order early listing

| @indiablooms | Jul 09, 2019, at 05:39 pm

New Delhi, Jul 9 (UNI) The Supreme Court on Tuesday said it would consider to hear a plea filed by a party on behalf of the majority community in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute seeking early listing of the case.

One of the plaintiffs contended before the Chief Justice of India court that there was no progress in the mediation process to resolve the dispute which dates back centuries when the temple at Lord Ram's birthplace was allegedly demolished to build the Babri Mosque.

After hearing this, the bench headed by CJI Ranjan Gogoi, said, 'We would see and consider to hear the petition.'

The petitioner community submitted that there is not much progress in the court-monitored mediation process, thereby it should give an urgent hearing into the matter.

"We will see and consider to hear your petition," the bench said and assured the petitioner that the matter would be listed for an hearing.

The apex court asked the petitioner to file an application so that it can consider to hear the case keeping in view the fact that the matter is of priority and an hearing is the need of the hour.   

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.