April 08, 2026 07:30 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Jaishankar’s high-stakes diplomatic tour: EAM to visit UAE this week, first visit amid Middle East conflict | Passport row: Barricades outside Pawan Khera’s Hyderabad house after Himanta Biswa Sarma's warning | ‘Allow excluded voters to vote’: Mamata slams voter list freeze amid SIR row, to move Supreme Court | US, Iran agree to 2-week ceasefire deal, reopening Strait of Hormuz | ‘Prudent to wait and watch’: RBI keeps repo rate unchanged at 5.25% amid global volatility | 91 lakh voters dropped from rolls in Bengal SIR; Muslim-majority Murshidabad tops deletion list | Air India CEO Campbell Wilson quits amid losses, regulatory heat after deadly Ahmedabad crash: Report | Could be taken out in one night: Donald Trump’s chilling warning to Iran as deadline approaches | IRGC Intelligence Chief Majid Khademi killed in Israeli-US strike | Setback for Arunachal CM Pema Khandu as SC orders CBI probe into public works contracts
UNI

Flashpoint Ayodhya: Supreme Court may order early listing

| @indiablooms | Jul 09, 2019, at 05:39 pm

New Delhi, Jul 9 (UNI) The Supreme Court on Tuesday said it would consider to hear a plea filed by a party on behalf of the majority community in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute seeking early listing of the case.

One of the plaintiffs contended before the Chief Justice of India court that there was no progress in the mediation process to resolve the dispute which dates back centuries when the temple at Lord Ram's birthplace was allegedly demolished to build the Babri Mosque.

After hearing this, the bench headed by CJI Ranjan Gogoi, said, 'We would see and consider to hear the petition.'

The petitioner community submitted that there is not much progress in the court-monitored mediation process, thereby it should give an urgent hearing into the matter.

"We will see and consider to hear your petition," the bench said and assured the petitioner that the matter would be listed for an hearing.

The apex court asked the petitioner to file an application so that it can consider to hear the case keeping in view the fact that the matter is of priority and an hearing is the need of the hour.   

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.