December 12, 2024 07:38 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Donald Trump vows to eliminate birthright citizenship after taking charge | No alliance with Congress in Delhi polls: AAP chief Arvind Kejriwal | Bengaluru techie's suicide: Atul Subhash's wife and her family booked | Bengaluru techie's suicide: Atul Subhash's wife and her family booked | INDIA bloc to knock on Supreme Court's doors over alleged EVM manipulation during Maharashtra polls | 'Babri Masjid should be rebuilt in Bengal's Murshidabad': TMC MLA Humayun Kabir sparks row | Rajnath Singh calls on Russian Prez Vladimir Putin in Moscow, discusses bilateral defence cooperation | Police to investigate conspiracy angle in Mumbai bus accident that killed 7 | Mamata Banerjee should lead INDIA bloc: Lalu Prasad Yadav | Opposition moves no-confidence motion against VP Jagdeep Dhankar in RS
Bulldozer Justice
Supreme Court has lashed out at the bulldozer actions that proceed without following the process of law | Photo courtesy: UNI

'Executive can't become judge and demolish house of accused': Supreme Court on bulldozer justice

| @indiablooms | Nov 13, 2024, at 05:17 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: Slamming the government's recurrent highhandedness, the Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled states can't demolish illegal houses instantly without following the process of law stating "executive can't become judge".

The action will be taken on public officials who will in a "high-handed" manner.

The government must give 15 days to the owners of the houses which are illegally constructed to respond.

If they fail to respond, then the constructions can be demolished and the entire process must be videographed.

The accused will be entitled to compensation if their houses are demolished without following the process of law.

The top court bench led by Justices BR Gavai and KV Vishwanathan was hearing a batch of pleas on how bulldozers were used to demolish properties by the authorities.

The bench said as quoted by The Times of India, "Rule of law provides a framework to make sure individuals know property will not be taken away arbitrarily."

"The executive can't declare a person guilty. If based only on allegation, it demolishes his house, it would strike at the basic principle of Rule of Law. Executive can't become a judge and decide to demolish an accused's property," it added.

The top court had reserved its judgement on October 1 with the passing of an interim order that prevented demolition of any property barring the illegal ones without permission until further notice.

The top court in its November 13 judgement also highlighted the secular fabric of India and stated there should be no religious biases when it comes to bulldozer action.

It has also stated the government can't demolish a property because the person is an accused or a convict.

The pleas that were filed before the Supreme Court had noted minority and marginalised communities were targeted by the bulldozer actions.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.