June 05, 2026 10:49 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
After Annamalai exit, BJP gives up Andhra Rajya Sabha seat in NDA rejig | K. Annamalai quits BJP, triggers speculations over his new party | RBI hits pause button again! Repo rate remains unchanged at 5.25% amid global turmoil | 'Was it directed by ruling ecosystem?': Congress questions LIC stake in Rajesh Exports under SEBI scanner | Boost for Congress! Vijay allots Tamil Nadu's lone Rajya Sabha seat to key ally | Fresh trouble for Mamata: Complaint filed over explosive Amit Shah claim in Osman Hadi case | 'Communication gap': Rajesh Exports rejects SEBI allegations, says revenues were not overstated | ₹15.2 lakh crore revenue questioned! SEBI action sends Rajesh Exports shares tumbling | 'If not now, when!': Sonam Wangchuk backs Cockroach Janta Party protest; spokespersons named ahead of founder Abhijeet Dipke's India return | Cabinet approves Rs. 10,000 crore support package to stabilise ATF prices for airlines
Image courtesy: wikipedia.org

Disapproval of marriage does not amount to abetment of suicide, rules Supreme Court

| @indiablooms | Jan 26, 2025, at 07:47 pm

New Delhi: Disapproving a marriage does not amount to abetment of suicide under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the Supreme Court has ruled.

A bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma made this observation while quashing a chargesheet against a woman accused of abetting the suicide of another woman allegedly in love with her son, PTI reported.

The case stemmed from disputes between the deceased and the appellant's son, who had refused to marry her, according to the report.

The appellant was accused of opposing the marriage and making disparaging remarks against the deceased.

"Even if the appellant expressed her disapproval towards the marriage of Babu Das and the deceased, it does not rise to the level of direct or indirect instigation of abetting suicide," the bench observed, according to the report.

It further stated that a remark such as suggesting the deceased should not live if she cannot marry her lover does not constitute abetment.

"There needs to be a positive act that creates an environment where the deceased is pushed to the edge in order to sustain the charge of section 306, IPC," the bench noted, reported PTI

The court highlighted that the deceased's family had also expressed unhappiness with the relationship, and mere disapproval of a marriage does not satisfy the requirements of instigation necessary to invoke Section 306 IPC.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.