July 20, 2025 03:34 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Odisha shocker: Minor girl set on fire by three men in Puri, Naveen Patnaik slams BJP govt | Patna hospital shooting: Over five accused arrested from West Bengal | Five jets were shot down: Donald Trump's new claim on Operation Sindoor | TMC backing infiltration, endangering Bengal's identity: PM Modi slams Mamata govt | Bihar must be protected from malicious intentions of RJD and Congress: PM Modi | 'You deserve to suffer just like me': Over 60 Delhi and Bengaluru schools receive 'hoax' bomb threats | 'We would caution against any double standards': India on NATO's warning over Russia trade sanctions | Karnataka govt blames RCB for Bengaluru stampede, refers to Kohli's online message too | 'Premature and irresponsible': Indian pilots' body slams Air India crash probe report | Bihar CM Nitish Kumar announces free electricity upto 125 units ahead of assembly polls
Sena Vs Sena
In images Uddhav Thackeray (L) & Eknath Shinde (R)

Can't drag on indefinitely, SC tells Maha Speaker to decide on MLAs facing disqualification in Sena vs Sena case

| @indiablooms | Sep 19, 2023, at 05:39 am

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has slammed Maharashtra Speaker Rahul Narwekar over delays in ruling on the disqualification of lawmakers in the Sena vs Sena row that took off after some lawmakers quit the Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena and joined the rebel faction led by now chief minister Eknath Shinde.

The court warned Narwekar he couldn't continue to drag after being given nearly five months to decide and demanded to know what action had been taken following the court's May 11 judgement.

A bench led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud told Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for Narwekar, that "Mr SG, he has to decide. He can't do this (keep delaying the decision). What did the Speaker do after the May 11 judgement by (this) court?"

The apex court reiterated its earlier order - to "decide the disqualification petitions within a reasonable period" - but this time left no room for interpretation, noting, "We direct that (the) Speaker shall hear the matter (of disqualification) no later than a period of one week".

The court also sought a proposed timeline of the hearing from Narwekar and reminded him that the office of the Speaker of the Maharashtra Assembly had to follow the dignity of the Supreme Court.

The court then listed the matter for its hearing in two weeks' time.

The Supreme Court's strong comments came as it heard a petition by the Uddhav Thackeray faction urging it to direct Narwekar to take an early decision on the petitions.

A total of 34 - filed by both sides - seeking disqualification of 56 MLAs, including Chief Minister Shinde, are pending.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the petitioner, told the court that the plea was filed after alleged prolonged inaction from the Speaker following the May 11 order.

Sibal said the September 14 hearing of the disqualification petitions was conducted only after the court listed his petition.

Narwekar began hearing disqualification petitions last week but only for a few hours before Shinde faction lawyers claimed they had not received some documents and it was postponed.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu