December 15, 2025 06:58 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Centre moves to replace MGNREGA with 'G Ram G', sets stage for winter session showdown | Messi surrounded by VIPs, fans rage: Five held in stadium vandalism case | 'Messi was uncomfortable, lost his cool!': Ex-India footballer reveals what really happened at chaotic Kolkata stadium | PM Modi embarks on historic three-nation visit to Jordan, Ethiopia, and Oman | Caught in Thailand! Fugitive Goa nightclub owners detained after deadly fire kills 25 | After Putin’s blockbuster Delhi visit, Modi set to host German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in January | Delhi High Court slams govt, orders swift compensation as IndiGo crisis triggers fare shock and nationwide chaos | Amazon drops a massive $35 billion India bet! AI push, 1 million jobs and big plans revealed at Smbhav Summit | IndiGo’s ‘All OK’ claim falls apart! Govt slaps 10% flight cut after weeklong chaos | Centre finally aligns IndiGo flights with airline's operating ability, cuts its winter schedule by 5%

Ayodhya High Court verdict on Ram Janmabhoomi: SC may hear petitions today

| @indiablooms | Oct 29, 2018, at 09:06 am

New Delhi, Oct 29 (IBNS): The Supreme Court  might hear a batch of petitions which challenged the  Ram Janmabhoomi verdict given by the Allahabad High Court in 2010.

As per the verdict, the disputed land on the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid area in the north Indian city of Ayodhya was divided into three portions.

The petitions will be heard by a bench of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and KM Joseph.

The dispute was triggered after the 16th Century mosque – Babri Masjid – was demolished by thousands of activists associated with right wing groups on December 6, 1992.

The High court, in 2010, had decided that the disputed land of 2.77 acre will be divided in three-way among the parties — the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara, and the Lord Ram Lalla. 

The court ordered each party a third of the land at the site.

After that the stakeholders in the case had moved the apex court.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.