July 04, 2026 05:48 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Why can't citizens protest against the government? They are being made slaves by slapping cases': Bombay HC slams Mumbai Police, quashes activist's externment | 'First he cheats on me...': Siya Goyal's old pub video goes viral amid probe into fiancé Ketan Agarwal's alleged murder | Ronaldo's goal, Ramos' last-gasp winner send Portugal past Croatia, set up Spain clash | India-US trade deal almost done! Piyush Goyal hints at breakthrough | Ram Mandir donation scam: Champat Rai points finger at his own driver | PM Modi welcomes Japanese PM Sanae Takaichi as India-Japan ties enter a new era | 'Not an isolated incident': India slams Pakistan after 125-year-old historic Gurdwara is demolished | Ram Mandir donation theft: Six accused were employed by Varanasi-based security firm, probe reveals | Ayodhya Ram Temple donation theft: Probe says majority of money was allegedly stolen during Kumbh Mela | Commercial LPG price slashed by Rs 183.50 from July 1; check new rates in Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata and Chennai

Ayodhya Case: Supreme Court issues notice to elderly man for threatening lawyer

| @indiablooms | Sep 03, 2019, at 02:11 pm

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday issued a notice to an 88-year-old man from Tamil Nadu for threatening a senior advocate for appearing on behalf of the Sunni Waqf Board and other Muslim parties in the Ayodhya land dispute case.

A five-judge Constitution bench of the Apex Court, headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi, issued notice to retired education officer N Shanmugam and sought a detailed response after hearing the contempt petition filed by Dr Rajeev Dhavan.

"This court issued notice to the respondent, Shanmugam. Let him file his detailed response on the entire issue. The contempt petition would be heard later," the bench said.

The court granted two weeks to Shanmugam to respond to the contempt petition.

Dhavan, in his petition, claimed that Shanmugam had allegedly cursed him for appearing on behalf of Muslim parties in the Ayodhya Ram Temple and Babri Masjid land (Title) dispute case.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.