December 14, 2025 03:21 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Caught in Thailand! Fugitive Goa nightclub owners detained after deadly fire kills 25 | After Putin’s blockbuster Delhi visit, Modi set to host German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in January | Delhi High Court slams govt, orders swift compensation as IndiGo crisis triggers fare shock and nationwide chaos | Amazon drops a massive $35 billion India bet! AI push, 1 million jobs and big plans revealed at Smbhav Summit | IndiGo’s ‘All OK’ claim falls apart! Govt slaps 10% flight cut after weeklong chaos | Centre finally aligns IndiGo flights with airline's operating ability, cuts its winter schedule by 5% | Odisha's Malkangiri in flames: Tribals rampage Bangladeshi settlers village after beheading horror! | Race against time! Indian Navy sends four more warships to Cyclone Ditwah-hit Sri Lanka | $2 billion mega deal! HD Hyundai to build shipyard in Tamil Nadu — a game changer for India | After 8 years of legal drama, Malayalam actor Dileep acquitted in 2017 rape case — what really happened?
Rift in Maharashtra ruling alliance widens over security cover. Photo courtesy: Facebook/Ajit Pawar

All is not well in Maharashtra ruling alliance with Eknath Shinde being upset over reduced security cover to its MLAs

| @indiablooms | Feb 18, 2025, at 11:15 pm

Mumbai/IBNS: Just three months after a landslide victory in the Maharashtra Assembly Elections, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party-Shiv Sena-NCP alliance seems to be having a widening rift over the withdrawal of 'Y'-security cover to some MLAs.

According to reports, while the cover has been downgraded or withdrawn for MLAs across all parties, the number is maximum for the Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena, which is upset over the move.

After Shinde rebelled and allied with the BJP in 2022, the Maharashtra government gave Y-security cover to 44 of its MLAs and 11 Lok Sabha MPs who had supported him.

However, as per reports, based on a security assessment, the cover has now been downgraded or withdrawn for all Shiv Sena MLAs and other leaders, including key aides of the party chief, who are not ministers.

The security has been downgraded or withdrawn for leaders from the BJP and the NCP too, but the number is highest for Shiv Sena with 20 of its leaders facing this.

Amid the row, Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis said decisions on security cover are taken by the Security Review Committee.

The panel reviews the security from time to time and decides accordingly.

"There is no political interference in the decisions by the committee. Therefore, no one should do politics on it," he said.

Shinde, who is reportedly still coping with the fact that he was not made the chief minister, has recently been accommodated in the State Disaster Management Authority by modifying rules after he was unhappy over being left out of it.

As chief minister, Fadnavis heads the authority while his other deputy and NCP chief Ajit Pawar is also part of it since he holds the finance portfolio.

Last week, the cabinet changed the rules of the panel to include the post of 'deputy chief minister'.

As per reports, all is not well between Eknath Shinde and Ajit Pawar too after the government decided not to go ahead with the appointment of NCP leader Aditi Tatkare and the BJP's Girish Mahajan as the guardian ministers of Nashik and Raigad.

From the Sena, Employment Guarantee Scheme Minister Bharatseth Gogawale and School Education Minister Dadaji Bhuse wanted to be given charge of the districts, especially since Nashik will be hosting the Kumbh Mela in 2027.

Shinde had also skipped a review meeting for the Kumbh Mela chaired by Devendra Fadnavis.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.